Objective, The (2008)



The Objective reviewReviewed by Paul McCannibal

Starring Michael C. Williams, Sam Hunter, Jeff Prewett, Jon Huertas

Directed by Daniel Myrick


It’s not surprising, given that this movie is from one of the directors of The Blair Witch Project, that there are numerous similarities in the two films. You’ve got a remote location that dominates the narrative. The path of the character collective is a disorienting labyrinth that implodes on itself to increasing interpersonal degrees and levels of frustration as the story plays out. You’ve got a strange, unknowably ominous force that creeps in and out of the tale, mostly at night. And you’ve even got the return of Michael C. Williams, who played a pivotal role in Blair Witch.

The big difference here is that it’s set in Afghanistan, and there is an unavoidable political hot potato at the heart of the story. Things kick off in November 2001 with a mercenary-type unit being co-opted by the CIA, under the ruse of going into the Afghani desert wastes based on intel relating to a potential nuclear threat from the Taliban.

Here’s where the movie’s moral ambiguity got in the way of the narrative and atmospheric impact for me. As someone who is 1000% against the Bush administration-engineered “War on Terror” and everything it stands for, I was waiting for an angle to either attack or applaud in this film. It’s all there as far as what you’d need to discuss in relation to the issue. You’ve got the US military in Afghanistan using ops to sway the regional pendulum in a way that suits US interests, you’ve got the influence of (or lack thereof) these efforts in relation to the Taliban and how that plays into things, the interaction with locals, military dudes handing out candies to kids, IED attacks, RPG’s fired by angry insurgents standing on cliffs in mountain passes ... the works. In The Objective there’s only one team of Americans and one Afghani guide, but the essence of the USA/NATO military presence in Afghanistan is very much there in narrative microcosm.

So, what I was trying to see throughout this film was where the director stood as far as what’s happening in Afghanistan, or how he sees the events unfolding, the propaganda aspect of “hearts and minds” vs. the on-the-ground reality, how political conjecture about military action and devastation is negated in the wake of brushed-off collateral civilian death tolls, how cultures are being “appealed” to, manipulated, corrupted, and eventually turned away by use of force in conjunction with political and military exploitation ... that kind of stuff. So you can see that this film was viewed through deeply shit colored glasses – simply put, I really don’t like what’s happening over there, and like some of the characters in this story, I don’t think we’re getting anything near the whole story.

Anyway, this movie is handled with absolute, tight-lipped seriousness all the way through, so any aspect of commentary on what was, to me at least, a very obvious political-perspective angle felt constrained. Maybe that was deliberate, maybe not. Who knows? Maybe the film is designed to scare, but also stir the pot in terms of topical discussion.

What I was left with at the end was total ambiguity. A couple of lines of dialogue stuck out. One was by the American figurehead of the mission, who said “What would happen if these people had the power to destroy other nations? You could only hope that by that time they would be tired of fighting.” Another line by one of the soldier-mercs was “We’re here to kill terrorists. The rest is paperwork.”

Now, if you were like me, and totally against the Afghanistan situation as it stands, you’d be able to condemn these lines as simplistic, imperialistic, xenophobic, ignorant, and so on. But if you were for the Afghanistan scenario as it has been carried out militarily by the West, thinking it all as being just and necessary, these lines, said as they were in the film without a hint of black humor or satire, could reflect exactly what drives the support you would feel for the situation and the West’s ongoing involvement in it.

So, as you can probably tell, this whole for-or-against aspect was a major distraction throughout the film for me. After seeing the film, I’d be very interested in hearing what the director’s take on the Afghanistan situation actually is.

On to the mechanics of the film, for horror fans. ... first off, the locations (Morocco posing as Afghanistan) are amazing. Over time you really get the sense of being way out there in a place you could never find your way back from. Once the characters are in the outlands the aesthetic barely shifts, but it works visually because you get a tangible sense of being lost. The militaristic character ensemble was grizzled and serious to a fault, giving things a straight-faced nod to the feel of Predator (which was enhanced even more by the ongoing perspective of the goings-on through an infrared camera in the hands of a key character). The ominous, potentially Islam-related energy/force they encounter intermittently is very intriguing, but I don’t think they gave us quite enough of it in the entirety of the film. Either that or the film could’ve been shortened by 15 minutes, because I started to feel the frustration of the characters over time in a way that wasn’t fun or white-knuckle inducing, just frustrating. As in “tell me what the fuck is going on or I’m going to shoot you” kind of frustrating. Like the characters said, multiple times.

But overall, it was well done and the topical narrative context is sure to get gums flapping. It’s also noteworthy, in my limited exposure to word of mouth about The Objective, how varied the response to the film is even if it is mostly in the positive sense. I give it a guarded recommendation. Fantasia programmer Simon Laperrière enthusiastically hails it as one of the best horror films this year, and cohort Mitch Davis has nothing but good things to say about it as well.

So see it for yourself. I think this is a movie worth your time. For more than one reason.

3 out of 5

Discuss The Objective in the Dread Central forums!




-->



moderator So we finally had a chance
Debi Moore's picture

So we finally had a chance to check this out last night, and while I mostly concur with McCannibal's review of the film on its own merits, although I'd have to give it a 3-1/2 at least (with the performances possibly nudging it up to a 4), I think he went a bit overboard with his focus on the moral/political angle. Yes, it's ambiguous, but had it been anything else, it would have felt overly heavy-handed. I'm no fan of our military's involvement in the region either, but I feel this film wasn't the place for a "message" -- it was all about the suspense and terror and paranoia of the situation. Also, I thought the quotes he mentioned did an excellent job of portraying the futility of the mission and didn't seem simplistic or ignorant in the least. Of course, we could have possibly seen slightly different cuts of the film since so much time has lapsed since Fantasia and he talked about shortening it by 15 minutes or so. The version we saw was just under 90 minutes.

But back to the film itself. As I said, the performances are stellar across the board -- I'm definitely partial to films with all-male casts since nothing grinds things to a halt faster than the whole "romance" angle. And the location is another character in and of itself -- it was pretty incredible. I do feel it lost a little focus and momentum toward the end, but all in all, it's a strong showing from Myrick and a really interesting horror/sci-fi hybrid that should get a good reception from genre fans once it's made available for them to see.


Submitted by Debi Moore on Wed, 02/04/2009 - 2:18pm.
Rorschach's picture

Wait forever? Don't all these films go to either wide theatrical release or DTV immediately? Or am I thinking of the AfterDark stuff?

*Confused*

Anyway, yeah....hopefully these soldiers come off as more....fully realized than the piss poor National Guard caricatures we got from HILLS HAVE EYES 2. Having been in the military myself, and having been surrounded by some truly bright people (ok, a few lunkheads too), I get frustrated when ALL military personnel are painted in stereotypical fashion: big, dumb, testosterone-overloaded meatheads.....and that goes for the men, too.


Submitted by Rorschach on Sat, 07/12/2008 - 9:14pm.
moderator Your saying "what I was left
Debi Moore's picture

Your saying "what I was left with at the end was total ambiguity" is a huge plus in my book and really makes me want to check this out. All too often a filmmaker's personal feelings become heavy-handed and override his message (Diary, anyone?), and truly ambiguous projects are few and far between. Thanks for whetting my appetite -- I just hope we don't have to wait forever to see it!


Submitted by Debi Moore on Thu, 07/10/2008 - 2:25pm.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.