Headlines


Perhaps the MPAA Won't Be Targeting the Horror Genre After all





We all know the MPAA mixes with the horror genre like oil and water, so it was no surprise when we ran a story stating that the MPAA was looking to cast a far more critical eye when it comes to rating films belonging to our beloved genre. But today there's a statement straight from the lion's mouth to suggest otherwise. Do you buy it?

Our friends at Horror-Movies.ca sent an email to the Motion Picture Association of America in the wake of yesterday's story about Blue Valentine's rating woes. Here's what came back from Vice President of Corporate Communications, Elizabeth Kaltman:

"Because filmmakers don't want to accept the NC-17 they are squeezing as much as they can into the R. The Ratings Board does not treat genres differently. Ratings are assigned based on the content of a particular movie and taken on a case-by-case basis.

As far as any plans to change policy regarding horror films, we are always looking at ways to ensure the system evolves and responds to the biggest concerns of the day for parents. We have no changes in the works but are talking to parents about what matters to them."

Interesting, yes? And while we can perhaps begin to breathe a sigh of relief, allow me offer this counterpoint: What exactly is the VP of Corporate Communications going to say? "Yes, you bet we're going to censor the shit out of every horror film that crosses our path." Probably not. I don't want to discredit the work done by our brothers-in-gore at Horror-Movies.ca, but it's important to take this statement with a PR grain of salt. They're right, there's no reason to panic, but time will tell whether or not the MPAA has changed its stance. Nothing else.

MPAA Embarrassed by Blue Valentine, Looks to Screw Horror Genre as a Result

- MattFini

VISIT THE EVILSHOP @ AMAZON!
Got news? Click here to submit it!
Let 'em have it in the comments section below.


-->




NEXT STORY

How about a functional adult rating? I mean, that's what NC17 was supposed to be: an alternative to X that did not imply explicit sex. Unfortunately, the MPAA saddled it with outrageous restrictions that make an NC17 movie unmarketable. So, let's do away with the utterly useless NC17 rating and replace it with a functional adult rating that does not restrict screen counts, advertising ability, etc.


Submitted by hegemon13 on Wed, 12/15/2010 - 4:41pm.
Terminal's picture

And shouldn't that picture read Must Penalize All Artists? Wouldn't that make more sense since they're penalizing artists more than punishing them?

Or are people too simple to understand the word penalize?
----------
"We are bad guys. That means we've got more to do other than bullying companies. It's fun to lead a bad man's life."


Submitted by Terminal on Wed, 12/15/2010 - 7:49am.
nonserviam03's picture

Yeah... Hatchet 2 getting NC17 and Piranha getting R blows my mind still.


Submitted by nonserviam03 on Wed, 12/15/2010 - 3:40am.
doubleh55's picture

I think Hatchet II was still way more violent than Phirana 3D. But both were way over the top.


Submitted by doubleh55 on Wed, 12/15/2010 - 12:34pm.
Vanvance1's picture

The MPAA statement is so ambiguous it means nothing at all.


Submitted by Vanvance1 on Wed, 12/15/2010 - 2:50am.
Terminal's picture

The world keeps spinning. The MPAA are hard on indies, and soft on big studio films. Same as it always was, same as it always will be.
----------
"We are bad guys. That means we've got more to do other than bullying companies. It's fun to lead a bad man's life."


Submitted by Terminal on Wed, 12/15/2010 - 2:11am.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.