The Foywonder's Ten Worst Horror Films of the Decade

The first decade of the new millennium has come to an end, and that means it is now time for film sites all over the web to begin posting their various retrospectives and lists recalling the decade that was. I generally as a rule dislike such lists because they are always so subjective. Then I said screw it and took it upon myself to do one of my own naming the ten worst horror movies of the past decade. Besides, people love bitching on the Internet about lists like this, and who am I to deny readers yet another excuse to get into pointless flame wars over personal opinions.

Of course, this list is just my personal opinion which is not legally binding ... unless Proposition 304 passes. And we all pray that it will.

The Foywonder's Ten Worst Horror Films of the Decade

I set two rules when putting this list together: Only horror movies that received fairly wide theatrical releases in the United States were eligible, and no direct-to-DVD or made-for-cable films were allowed. Otherwise, I would have had a list full of cheap garbage from Thailand or it would have consisted of six Ulli Lommel serial killer flicks, two Sci-Fi Channel turds, and some no-budget pieces of crap Lionsgate and The Asylum dumped onto DVD. I chose to focus my attention on the more deserving big screen bombs, the horrors that only horrified in the sense that major Hollywood studios spent millions making and marketing them. I spent weeks looking back upon the Hollywood horrors released to multiplexes from 2000-2009, often reevaluating my own opinions on many a film until I finally narrowed the list down to what I felt were the ten most deserving of the distinction of being labeled the worst horror movies of the past ten years.

You can go NUMBER 10 directly on the NEXT Page

"Like" DreadCentral on Facebook for more breaking horror news.

Before diving headfirst into the worst list, it is time to unveil the HONORABLE MENTIONS. You might be wondering what constitutes an honorable mention when listing the worst horror movies? These are the fright flicks that definitely deserved to be ranked amongst the decade's worst but I just could not bring myself to put them on the list because their undeniable badness proved a laugh riot. The following four honorable mentions are granted a stay of execution for being so bad they're funny.

The Foywonder's Ten Worst Horror Films of the Decade


A motion picture that will live in infamy. The movie that effectively introduced the movie-watching world to a mad German named Uwe Boll and we've never been the same since. Trash talking before the release about how his film was going to kick Resident Evil's ass - way to set the bar high there, Uwe; trash talking Internet fanboys after the release for decrying his magnum opus as an incompetent and incoherent debacle that has only the faintest ties to the plotless video game on which it is based. At least it's lively, something that cannot be said of a few other Boll-infused snoozers. This deliriously insane mess verges so sharply into Edward D. Wood, Jr., territory on so many occasions House of the Dead may very well be Plan 9 from Outer Space for the 21st Century. Boll tried putting out a "funny version" of this film that wasn't even 1/100th as intentionally funny as his crowning achievement was unintentionally so.


Four words: non-religious identical twin stigmata. A high concept movie in the sense that everyone involved with the making of it had to have been high. In Lindsay Lohan's case, that's a given. What's everyone else's excuse? This level of jaw-dropping WTF-ness requires serious effort. You simply cannot make a movie that achieves the levels of badness that this surreal schlock does without having started out with loftier goals and without question I Know Who Killed Me was clearly a Herculean effort on the part of its makers. A perfect storm of cinema gone wrong: a tabloid fodder actress trying to change her on-screen image even though it's her off-screen image that needs changing and an off-the-charts preposterous screenplay that not even a director created by Dr. Frankenstein from the parts of Alfred Hitchcock, David Lynch, Lamberto Bava, Tod Browning, and Brian De Palma could make into a workable film. Simply has to be seen to be believed!


Mark Wahlberg giving the best performance in the history of cinema by an actor behaving like a man suffering from a concussion not actually playing a character suffering from a concussion; Zooey Deschanel doing the most uncanny impression of a perpetually startled lemur you will ever see; philosophical arguments in defense of the hot dog; people trying to outrun and even outsmart the wind. A loopy ecological thriller about pissed-off plants that cause people to commit suicide in the most preposterous manner possible; to think when the decade began M. Night Shyamalan was being compared to the likes of Alfred Hitchcock and Steven Spielberg.


If you need me to tell you why then you either haven't seen the remake of The Wicker Man or you haven't watched this highlight video.

This leads us to a very special DISHONORABLE MENTION. This one did not quite make the final cut but it remains worthy of special consideration. If for any reason any of the following ten worst horror movies of the decade are unable to fulfill their obligations as one of the ten worst horror movies of the past ten years, this first runner-up will be asked to step in and complete the list.


The Foywonder's Ten Worst Horror Films of the DecadeVampires. Cyberpunk. Anime aesthetics. Kung fu. Gun fu. Flaming sword fights. Milla Jovovich in spandex. What's not to love? EVERYTHING! What was meant to be a visual tour-de-force ended up being an unwatchable mess made all the more intolerable by its insufferably smug look-how-cool-I-am attitude. Of all the movies listed here that I saw in a theater, Kurt Wimmer's masturbatory case study in putting style over all the stuff that makes a movie watchable was the only one that led to the most walkouts - over two thirds of the audience were long gone before the closing credits rolled. So why isn't Ultraviolet one of the top ten instead of a runner-up? Ultimately, that characters are these mutant vampires called "hemophages" was more an excuse to explain why everyone fights with superhuman abilities than it adds a horrorific vibe to this Skittles-colored world of tomorrow. Therefore, a dishonorable mention is in the cards. Rest assured, though, Ultraviolet is one of the worst films of the past decade of any genre.

This brings us to the reason you are reading this in the first place. In compiling my list I chose not to bother with a numerical countdown. Personally, I see no point in trying to put these dreadful little films in some sort of numbered list except when it comes to my choice for the single worst horror movie of the decade. Nine horrible horrors presented in no particular order leading to the one cinematic abomination that stands above and beyond all others in terms of epic fail. Without further ado...

The list starts on the NEXT Page

"Like" DreadCentral on Facebook for more breaking horror news.



This may be my all time favorite list. I have recommended it to anyone who says the words Van Helsing in my presence...which is way more often than I'd like to admit. kudos on that epic last line. Way to drive that final nail in the coffin. No one will EVER be a better Dracula than Gary Oldman.

Submitted by DaveBauchery on Sun, 07/24/2011 - 12:49am.
dwesthatesyou's picture


I had to immediately put your 4 honorary mentions/hilarious pieces of cinematic shit in my Netflix queque and move them to the top.

Submitted by dwesthatesyou on Thu, 01/14/2010 - 6:04pm.

Happy to not see the Texas remake on the list. Take away the original, and watched with an open mind, it wasn't terrible.

However, the unborn was fucking AWFUL. Honestly, never in my life did I watch anything that was taking itself seriously that was that terrible. Van helsing was definitely crap, but I'm not sure it was taking itself 100% seriously. I completely agree with everything you've said in your lists, but would have added the unborn...probably at #1. it doesn't even suck by virtue of being a bad remake. At least we are predisposed to dislike remakes.

Also...where's the first twilight? I had to sit through opening night in a college town theater...talk about horror. The only movie I ever fell asleep to in a theater.

Submitted by Axeslinger0u812 on Sat, 01/02/2010 - 3:31am.
jesstro's picture

I think your list is right on... however, Van Helsing... #1? Its more of a comedic action movie, the only "horror" themes that exist in the movie, is its vagrant use of classic horror monsters. To compare it to movies that actually had the intention of being scary (in which they failed miserably) is not really fair. Sure it sucked, but it did have its moments as an action movie, which it should be seen as.

Submitted by jesstro on Mon, 12/28/2009 - 3:05pm.
TheVictorian's picture

There's no way in hell AVPR was worse than AVP.

Death Race should be in there as well. And that slasher film Uwe Boll made, seed, the only film where i was envious of the victims fate as they'd got off easy.

All the world will be you enemy

Submitted by TheVictorian on Sun, 12/27/2009 - 8:02pm.
Didn't See It Coming's picture

Black Xmas and Van Helsing are not only the 2 worst horror movies of the decade but are the worst I have ever seen in theatres.

Halloween Resurrection is awful but so was Zombie's Halloween. I'll never watch either again to give a fair comparison but either way, bad is bad.

Submitted by Didn't See It Coming on Sun, 12/27/2009 - 1:27pm.

The Wicker Man highlight video is fuckin' great! I never get tired of watching it

Submitted by Blue Eyed Demon on Sat, 12/26/2009 - 11:42am.
Count Zartro's picture

I can't argue with too much on that list. I'm in the camp that would have had Zombie's Halloween II on there, but I don't know what I would have taken off to get it on there.

As far as Rob Zombie hate, as a horror director he is debatably 1 for 4 as far as good movies go and lives off the reputation of his music. I think he is capable of making horror films I would want to see, but he needs to be working with properties that fit his style. Stuff like Motel Hell, Eaten Alive, Blood Salvage, Hunters Blood.

And you know what RZ's Halloween II had that John Carpenter's didn't? A white horse. I didn't care for Zombie's take on the first Halloween, but I know horror fans who did, so I get that, but Zombie's Halloween II was pure shit.

Submitted by Count Zartro on Sat, 12/26/2009 - 12:23am.

its just sad seeing all these remakes. NONE of these damn films need to be remade. The 70's was the RULING period for QUALITY horror with great STORY LINES!

Submitted by jayspray on Wed, 12/30/2009 - 5:23pm.
Sirand's picture

Having re-watched about 15 minutes of Halloween Resurrection on a recent TV airing, I have to say Foy is 100% correct: It's worse than Zombie's two films.

Zombie's Halloweens were misguided self-indulgent shit but at least the man cared about the misguided self-indulgent shit he was making...even if he was the only one who liked it. Resurrection is just a disgrace on all levels. It's nothing more than an MTV-special manufactured for the dumbest fucking teens on the planet.

Even the worst trailer trash line in Zombie's films sounds Oscar-calibur compared to the shit Busta Rhymes spews in that movie.

Submitted by Sirand on Sat, 12/26/2009 - 12:25am.
Floydian Trip's picture

So the Rob Zombie haters aren't just satisfied with hating him but that also extends to people that like him too? Mental midgets.

Submitted by Floydian Trip on Sat, 12/26/2009 - 12:14am.
DavidFullam's picture

Yeah, it got old about 100 years ago.

Submitted by DavidFullam on Sat, 12/26/2009 - 12:38pm.
Foywonder's picture

I beg to differ. The mere fact that half the comments to this article has revolved around the merits or lack thereof Rob Zombie's Halloween flicks tells me it is and will continue to be a hotly debated subject matter a long time to come.

I don't look down on the people that like Zombie's remake - I'm genuinely baffled as to what it is they like. Yet they defend it vehemently even though it does so little to earn that loyalty. Rob Zombie's Halloween is like the Sarah Palin of horror cinema.

Submitted by Foywonder on Sat, 12/26/2009 - 6:21pm.
Terminal's picture

It's also funny that people will smash Platinum Dunes for being hacks remaking great horror in to bad horror for purely cash purposes yet people defend Zombie for doing the exact same thing. People act like he's some auteur or misunderstood genius who hasn't found his niche yet. The man had five fucking chances and failed four times. Wow.

Submitted by Terminal on Thu, 01/14/2010 - 6:14pm.
DavidFullam's picture

When did anyone in the Rz Halloween films claim to know all about Russia as it lies next door? :)

Submitted by DavidFullam on Sun, 12/27/2009 - 10:35pm.
Floydian Trip's picture

The Zombie hate is really fucking old and tired. Get over it. I can't wait until he makes another excellent horror film like House or Devil's and I better not see one of these people commenting about it.

Submitted by Floydian Trip on Fri, 12/25/2009 - 1:59pm.
Terminal's picture

Yeah! Then we can get more movies about psychotic hillbillies and a bearded Michael Meyers! Well, I had my say about people who defend Zombie.

Submitted by Terminal on Fri, 12/25/2009 - 4:42pm.

Granted the redneck subplots are repetitive, but you are saying that the Curse of the Thorn and occultists were much better? I mean, truthfully, Carpenter hasn't directed a decent picture since his Prince of Darkness trilogy. I mean, I am surprised "Ghost of Mars" isn't on the list. Just saying...

Submitted by robertmundy on Fri, 12/25/2009 - 9:08pm.
Terminal's picture

I'd eat that mark of thorn crap any day over Zombie's shitty redneck hillbilly bullsht.

Submitted by Terminal on Thu, 01/14/2010 - 6:25pm.
tedge1979's picture

Great list, Foy. I completely agree with your pick for VAN HELSING, but I've gotta admit... I kinda dig DOOM. Its what would have happened if Roger Corman directed ALIENS, but once he was done giving birth to it, dropped it on its head a few times. Its got a terrible charm that I can't quite ignore.

But, as always, you do a fine job of kickin' ass, Foy. Kudos, good sir.

Submitted by tedge1979 on Fri, 12/25/2009 - 1:25pm.
kiddcapone's picture

I don't agree about Resurrection being worse than Rob Zombie's bullshit. At least it still had MICHAEL MYERS, the Halloween theme music, and decent kills. Delete the kung-fu bullshit, and eliminate the hatred about rappers turned actors, and it's a different movie. Still, not good, but not nearly the worst of the decade.

I also don't consider a lot of films to be "horror". Yes, Scary Movie 2, Premonition, Ultraviolet, and Doom sucked balls, but I wouldn't put them on a horror list. There's still a bunch of films that fall into the "gray" area, but I'll continue..

My ten would include:

10 - House of 1000 Corpses
9 - Black Christmas
8 - Halloween
7 - Feardotcom
6 - The Fog
5 - Alone in the Dark
4 - Friday the 13th
3 - The Ring 2
2 - Funny Games
1 - Van Helsing

Dishonorable Mention: Jason X, White Noise, Dracula 2000, House of the Dead, The Wicker Man, and When a Stranger Calls.

Kiddcapone - "Breaking the 4th wall since 1974"

Submitted by kiddcapone on Fri, 12/25/2009 - 2:19pm.
kiddcapone's picture

Oh, and for the record, I never saw all of Halloween 2 yet. That's the only reason why it didn't make my list. I refuse to help it make one extra cent. I watched 20 minutes of a downloaded copy but it was way too dark. I'll rent it from Netflix and then shit all over it.

Submitted by kiddcapone on Sat, 12/26/2009 - 6:58pm.
Floydian Trip's picture

Well said Mundy. Couldn't agree more. Very thoughtful.

Submitted by Floydian Trip on Fri, 12/25/2009 - 10:25am.

I agree with everything in the article and the majority of the comments. Except for the ones regarding the Halloween remakes. You see, as much as I agree with some of the criticisms of "H2", I don't believe that Carpenter's sequel, "Halloween II" is as good as everybody proclaims it to be. I think just because it was the original sequel, it automatically gets exempt from criticism. Truthfully, if one really examines Carpenter's sequel, they will discover that that the majority of the complaints for Zombie's sequel are also prevalent in Carpenter's film. Take for instance the acting, which seems to be a major issue. In Halloween II, Donald Pleasance's Loomis spends the majority of his time running around, yelling "He's evil" or the eternal, "I shot him six times in the heart!" Whatever arc of development the character went through did not continue. Or, Jamie Lee Curtis' performance: she spent the majority of the film in a drugged haze...which eliminates any development and is...not complex acting. Characters aside, let's talk about the violence. "Halloween II"'s violence is almost on the same level as Zombie's: two people--Dr. Mixter and the nurse, whose name eludes me-- have syringes jammed in their eyes; the security guard at the hospital has head split open, and is then hung; and do I need to mention what happened to Mrs. Alves?

My point in all of this is, yes, the Zombie sequel will never meet the expectations of the fans of the original series; as Bob Dylan once said, "the times are a-changin'". The studio system as well as the audiences have changed drastically...so, instead of original vision, we have remakes and prequels....if anything could be said positively of Zombie, it's that he created his own vision, for better or for worse (in fact, it has a better narrative weight--it's an allegory of how crime writers, such as Vincent Bugliosi, exploit murder and destroy lives, while they better their own.)

Before I leave, I want to mention something that has been ignored on the boards: "Halloween II" was not well-received during its time, either. Roger Ebert wrote a review focusing on the idiot plot that drives the film, and many reviewers found it to be primarily "violence-driven" with a flimsy narrative.

Sound familiar?

Submitted by robertmundy on Fri, 12/25/2009 - 10:02am.
Terminal's picture

Sounds like a lot of excuses, mundy. And if you're implying that Zombie's monstrosities are ahead of their time, then you sir are of questionable sanity.

Submitted by Terminal on Fri, 12/25/2009 - 4:53pm.

This is a bit ridiculous because we have no way of knowing if a film is a ahead of its time until said time passes. So Zombie's films could be ahead of their time. Most horror movies get trashed by critics of their era but go on to eventually receive the accolades they deserve. The Thing was received poorly by critics and audiences. Most critics hated the original TCM and NOTLD, as passed them off as akin to porn in the same way the so-called torture porn horror films (which Zombie gets lumped in with) get ignored. I'm not saying this will happen, but it could. And to claim it can't is ignorant because we have no way of knowing how these movies will influence the next generation of horror films.

Submitted by AngryChairr on Sat, 12/26/2009 - 1:24am.
LifeMi's picture

I agree that Pleasance and Curtis are shortchanged in the original H2, but you can't even remotely compare Rosenthal's H2 to Zombie's H2. Furthermore, you can't really take anything Ebert says about slasher films seriously. I can see why some people might not like the original H2 (I personally dig it); I can't understand how anyone in their right mind can like Zombie's film.

Submitted by LifeMi on Fri, 12/25/2009 - 8:53pm.
fceurich39's picture

agreed on all films well almost the black christmas remake was bad but i loved the awfulness factor kinda reminded me of silent night deadly night which is my favorite x-mas and black x-mas is so bad it's fun

also AVPR I liked a whole hell of alot better than AVP i mean come on how could we stand the PG-13 alien vs predator film and the unrated director's cut wasn't much better now granted the AVPR worse thing about it was the lighting but aside from that i thought it was miles above AVP.

now granted i have really bad things about Halloween H20 mainly for the cgi mask and the whole scream elements which i actually hate more than resurrection which too me was alright with the exception of busta rhymes kung fu'ing michael myers

Submitted by fceurich39 on Fri, 12/25/2009 - 12:28am.

I'll only defend Zombie's remake in as far as the first half of the movie, which would have made an okay origin story. Sure, it abandoned everything that made the original kid Myers scary -- the good, young, white, middle class suburban kid suddenly snapping and killing someone for no reason -- but it had some merit from at least the direction on Zombie's part. It showed he knew what he was doing behind the camera, if not on the page. Would I have preferred a better origin story? Sure. It could've been a great satire on the "people from the suburbs don't just kill people" notion that permeates this country, but it also could've been a lot worse. The only part of the movie I took real exception with was Zombie continuing his offensive stereotypes of "white trash." The rest either looked great, or was boring at worst. Nothing quite like the mindfuck insanity of Resurrection where you had them going off on tangents like Laurie's murder having no bearing on anything in the movie after it happened or Kung Fu Busta Rhymes. That was just awful.

Submitted by AngryChairr on Fri, 12/25/2009 - 12:05am.
i3ullseye's picture

Fantastic list! Sure, there are 2 or 3 I disagree with (loved 13 Ghosts myself), but the top 10 are spot on. And yes, Van helsing had me amped for potential greatness also, only to have my hopes and dreams dashed upon the harsh jagged rocks of all too real disappointment.

Shit like this is the reason I compulsively come back to this site.

Not sure how Jennifers Body wasn't in the top 10 however. To me, that is worse than half your top 10 listed.

Submitted by i3ullseye on Thu, 12/24/2009 - 6:50pm.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.