Shark Swarm (DVD)

Shark Swarm DVD review (click for larger image)Reviewed by The Buz

Starring John Schneider, Daryl Hannah, Armand Assante, forty pissed off man-eaters

Directed by James A. Contner

Distributed by Genius Products


Sharks are fierce. That's a fact. You know what's also fierce? A fuck ton of sharks. More to the point, a Shark Swarm! *cues ominous music* Such is the title of the new entry into the Man-Eater series and the Hallmark Channel's foray into the horror genre.

First off, I love sharks. I saw Jaws as a wee lad, and sharks have both terrified and fascinated me ever since. In essence I'm a sucker for killer shark movies. From Jaws to Deep Blue Sea to even Shark Attack 3: Megalodon. As a matter of fact I'm listening to the Jaws soundtrack as I write this. I just can't get enough of sharks eating oblivious swimmers off of coasts (or sometimes up rivers), so of course when I heard there was going to be a mini-series about multiple sharks attacking everything in sight, I was ecstatic.

Shark Swarm DVD review (click for larger image)When Dan Wilder (John Schneider), Full Moon Bay's local fisherman, refuses to sell his land to the greedy Hamilton Lux (Armand Assante), Lux begins to dump toxic waste into the bay to destroy the local fish population and eventually starve Daniel and his family out into selling their land. All in the name of really expensive condos. However, the toxins aren't killing the local sharks; instead they are increasing their aggressiveness. With no fish to eat, the sharks begin to turn to the only other thing in the water they can eat. Humans. The great thing here, though, is that we're not just dealing with a couple of great whites or a few killer makos. It's a gaggle of killer sharks. A shark swarm! *cues ominous music again* There are threshers, makos, hammerheads, bull sharks, and of course big mean great whites. In very large angry packs. So now it is up to Daniel, his wife (a lackluster Daryl Hannah), his marine biologist brother, a concerned E.P.A agent, and F. Murray Abraham as the genius college professor Bill Girdler to expose Mr. Lux's plan and stop the killer swarm from destroying their coastal town.

Now this is a made-for-TV movie, and with it comes some baggage. But first the good. Surprisingly, the production values for Shark Swarm are incredibly high, especially for a TV movie. The cinematography is fantastic, and the set pieces are pretty good. The score isn't bad either, reminding me somewhat of Aliens in some parts. But the best thing going for Shark Swarm is its characters. Leave to the Hallmark Channel to cast normal looking people instead of supermodels for every role. John Schneider does an excellent job playing stubborn family man Dan Wilder as he earnestly tries to convince the town of Hamilton of Lux's dirty tricks. He comes across as flesh and blood, which I dug and is something you rarely see in TV movies. His first mate Clint (Brent King), however, steals the show. As the young happy-go-lucky kid eager to make a living, he was by far my favorite character. There is a great father/son approach to Daniel and Clint's relationship, making Clint one of the most sympathetic and interesting characters to watch. Even though the characters aren't the same in any way, his name does rhyme with Quint so he could be a subtle nod to Jaws, though I could just be reaching on that one.

Shark Swarm DVD review (click for larger image)Dan's brother, Phil Wilder, who teaches marine biology at the local college, is also one of the best characters. Roark Critchlow, the actor playing Phil, must have seen Shark Attack 3: Megalodon before shooting began because he channels John Barrowman's character throughout the film. His interaction with E.P.A agent Amy Zuckerman (Heather McComb) screams THE LINE. Whenever he was on screen talking, I kept quietly whispering the sacred LINE and then chuckled to myself. He's hilarious and has some of the greatest flirting techniques I've ever heard. In fact the film has a lot of great bits of dialogue, one of my favorites being: “Did you show her your longboard?” That made me laugh hysterically. Phil Wilder also shares the most screen time with F. Murray Abraham, who is always fun to watch .

The bad guys are also very well written and rounded out. I'm a firm believer in having strong bad guys, ala Grueber from Die Hard, and not one-dimensional ones, a la Bennet from Commando. While Hamilton Lux and Kane Markus are no Grueber(s), they are still very good at displaying real motivations and are charismatic people. Hamilton Lux (which could also be a reference to Jaws because Murray Hamilton played Mayor Larry Vaughn, the antagonist in Jaws) is liked by everyone in town, and he keeps his head cool when under fire from the Wilder clan. All in all, though, he is just a greedy corporate whore. His henchman Kane, while playing up to be overtly Italian, has some great witty banter with Daniel and comes off as a very loyal employee of Mr. Lux (is Kane gonna have to choke a bitch?).

You'd think because it's Hallmark that the amount of kills would be cut down. Not here. I kept a running tally, and according to my calculations there is body count of thirty-seven and a hand. That is the single highest body count of any killer shark movie I've ever seen. And they show no mercy with whom they kill. From emo-environmentalists to Baptist churchgoers, the sharks kill and eat everything in sight. They even torture a poor little girl throughout the film a la Piranha. Speaking of which, many of the attack scenes were very reminiscent of that film with sharks sucking folks through inner tubes and swarming upon groups of people like big fucking vicious piranha. Of course, this made me happy. The CGI, while shoddy in some places, looks fairly good overall. Better than most killer shark movies, and especially great for a TV movie. The sharks also make the same noise as the smoke monster from "Lost", which was a little odd, but it's better than a roaring shark like the one from Jaws: The Revenge.

Shark Swarm DVD review (click for larger image)The pacing is also a plus. Coming in at 164 minutes, it is a pretty long watch. However, it really doesn't feel that long because the shark attacks just keep coming, and it doesn't let up. Needless to say, I was never bored.

But ...

With good comes bad. My two biggest complaints are Daryl Hannah and the shark attacks themselves. With movies like Blade Runner, Kill Bill, and Dancing at the Blue Iguana on her resume, I always thought Hannah was a fairly good actress. After her performance in Shark Swarm *cues ominous music a third time for continuity's sake* though, I have a few doubts. She is completely dry and emotionless throughout the entire film. It is the very definition of a phoned-in performance. I found it hard not to laugh every time she talked to someone because she looked slightly cross-eyed. She even made what was supposed to be a very emotional scene into a dry and almost comedic one. Hannah was just utterly terrible. This, of course, makes me question if she was ever a good actress. Could she have been fooling us all this entire time? Could killer shark swarms have finally revealed her for the cardboard cut-out she is? I'll have to do more research on this subject and get back to you.

Her daughter was also a bit of a stiff. While the actress did a fine job, she seemed to always be wandering aimlessly on the beach for no apparent reason whatsoever with a somewhat vacant, soulless look. Or she could have just been prowling for surfer cock, so who am I to judge?

As for the shark attack scenes, if I have to see one more blood puddle in the ocean, I'm going to shoot somebody. It was like the ocean was having its period. As I said before, there are thirty-seven kills with an attack probably every ten or fifteen minutes. While I fully appreciated this, almost every attack consisted of the sharks just biting at the screen and then a pool of blood appearing on the surface of the water. That's it. While for a TV movie it is incredibly violent, it would have been nice to actually see the sharks bite someone instead of just the aftermath. It seems like they ran out of money and could only afford a water cannon full of fake blood. They could have easily cut out a few of the shark attacks and expanded on a few others. In one of the best scenes in the movie a group of scuba divers are attacked. It is filmed wonderfully, but this is the only scene where you actually get to see a shark bite someone. Other than that ... blood puddle. I'm sure Hallmark's regular audience will find the blood puddles quite terrifying though.

Another problem I had with the film was the absence of concern. No one really seemed to care that about twenty or so people had gone missing. There are few mentions of them here and there such as: “Hey, have you seen so-and-so?” or “Where'd that lifeguard boy go?” but no real cause for concern. When twenty plus people have disappeared in a small town over a period of two days, I think people would be a bit more freaked out.

Shark Swarm DVD review (click for larger image)And while the pacing of the film was brisk, there were many poorly edited scenes. Sometimes shots would just not flow well together. I'd blame this mainly on attempting to cut out certain violent shots by cutting them short.

The climax of the film is also a little lacking. Our main characters get their hands on electric pulse guns and begin shooting the swarms of sharks with them to “scramble their circuits.” While this was awesome initially, it was kind of a letdown when that's all they were doing to fight the sharks. I'd be curious to know if there was a bigger climax written but then cut due to budget constraints and the pulse guns were all that got used. However, the climax also comes with a lot of great shark attacks, and we're given a little more than just a blood puddle. For that I was thankful. After the big finale with the bad guys getting their retribution, as well as a bitch bartender, I found myself slipping into a diabetic coma with the overly sweet crane shot of all the survivors hugging on the beach. That wasn't necessary.

Basically, I enjoyed myself. Most killer shark movies these days are nothing short of awful, but Shark Swarm *cues ominous music for the last time until the sequel* kept me entertained the whole way through, and it rightfully deserves its place as one of the better films in the killer animal movie genre. The filmmakers did their research and pulled off a convincing and entertaining thrill ride, with just a few too many blood puddles. It is something I would respectfully place between Jaws and Piranha on my DVD shelves. And at least it didn't have an LL Cool J song to accompany the credits, even though his hat was like a shark's fin.

In any case, you're still going to need a bigger boat.

Special Features

  • Dozens of scenes that show blood in the water

    Film:

    3 out of 5

    Special Features:

    0 out of 5

    Discuss Shark Swarm in our Dread Central forums!



  • Chainsaw's picture

    This gets a pass with me simply because they set the movie in a place called Full Moon Bay.


    Submitted by Chainsaw on Mon, 06/02/2008 - 12:01pm.

    I think Merlin said it best in Excalibur: "Ultimo Franco, a dream to some, a nightmare to others!"

    Then there's EvilRex's professional opinion: "Franco, you just have a way about you that can rub people raw, man."

    And finally, there's WIB, who wisely said once: "I'd give my left tit to have Franco's love child."

    Wait, was that another example of me being too "outspoken"???


    Submitted by Ultimo Franco on Wed, 05/28/2008 - 8:41pm.
    Blockbuster's picture

    I just wanted to say that I hate UF. I don't know why. I've never met anyone here. I just wanted to throw in my two cents. Ok. Now I don't hate UF anymore. Damn this bipolar disorder!

    Hey...someone should make a movie about that!! Heh.


    Submitted by Blockbuster on Wed, 05/28/2008 - 2:32am.
    Gus Bjork's picture

    Hey cool! My AV is showing. It kind of inspires me to lobby the US Post Office for a set of Stan Winston postage stamps.

    Course Stan would have to be dead for 10 years first...hmmmmmm.


    Submitted by Gus Bjork on Wed, 05/28/2008 - 12:00am.
    Terminal's picture

    Rephrase:
    "Did anyone besides the writer's friends and a few others actually see the movie before complaining?"


    Submitted by Terminal on Tue, 05/27/2008 - 11:11pm.
    Terminal's picture

    "3 pages about a movie starring John Schneider and CGI sharks.

    Who knew? LOL"

    I'm surprised too. If this wasn't made by two people here this movie would have been ignored, barely commented on, and left to pasture. Come on people, this movie doesn't warrant all this controversy. Did anyone beside the writer's friends and a few other users, actually see this?

    I did. I saw the whole thing, non-stop, at full attention, and disregarding its writers, and just wrote the damn review. Forget it's MM and UF, I really want to know what people thought of the MOVIE.


    Submitted by Terminal on Tue, 05/27/2008 - 11:10pm.
    Terminal's picture

    Hey as long as the longer project is entertaining I say "More power to you." I personally prefer to judge the work, and not the workers, and I have to say I thought "Ring of Death" and "Shark Swarm" were terrible. And that was not because of my personal feelings for MM or UF, I just sat and watched as if they were just any typical movie I was watching.


    Submitted by Terminal on Tue, 05/27/2008 - 11:05pm.

    Show me a critic and I'll ignore him (or her). That's clearly not what this has been about. But that doesn't mean I'm not still interested in hearing what people think about the movie once they've seen it on DVD, however. That's "professional," isn't it? Who wouldn't be interested in how their work was received? That's part of the reason why people want to do work like this, to get an audience reaction. That and the fact that it's fun as hell.


    Submitted by Ultimo Franco on Tue, 05/27/2008 - 10:54pm.
    moderator 3 pages about a movie
    Uncle Creepy's picture

    3 pages about a movie starring John Schneider and CGI sharks.

    Who knew? LOL


    Submitted by Uncle Creepy on Tue, 05/27/2008 - 10:44pm.
    moderator Wow -- these comments are
    The Woman In Black's picture

    Wow -- these comments are unreal. I wish one of my reviews got such attention!


    Submitted by The Woman In Black on Tue, 05/27/2008 - 10:40pm.
    NMEwithin's picture

    Why is this important to you? Is your name Franco? at any rate...I said my piece.


    Submitted by NMEwithin on Tue, 05/27/2008 - 10:12pm.

    "Critics, people with vendettas, random loons...what's the difference?"

    Do you really need this explained to you? Hell, you just pointed out the difference. Critics, whether they're professional or just opinionated viewers, are people who view something subjectively and comment on them. People with just vendettas just spout out hyperbole because they want to bring someone down they hate. It's that simple.


    Submitted by Sirand on Tue, 05/27/2008 - 10:05pm.
    admin moderator I agree with that. To me
    Undeadmin's picture

    I agree with that. To me this is kind of a reap what you sow situation. If they weren't so "outspoken" this uproar wouldn't be happening.

    I'm more concerned with Buz's review being written off so easily. I think it was more than a fair shake, and I sat through the movie too.

    I think saying it was average fodder is fair on a 5 star system you wind up with a bell curve. Not all 3's are equal, some are better some are worse.


    Submitted by Undeadmin on Tue, 05/27/2008 - 9:44pm.
    NMEwithin's picture

    Critics, people with vendettas, random loons...what's the difference/ When you put your name out in the public domain, you have no choice but to take the bad with the good. Just my two cents.


    Submitted by NMEwithin on Tue, 05/27/2008 - 9:37pm.

    NME, I can't speak for Franco, but...

    It doesn't seem that Franco has an issue with any of the professional criticism he has recieved in response to his work. I'd imagine that would be the sort of thing he'd thrive on, whether utilizing it as a development tool or simply as a means of connecting with the fans.

    However, it does seem that he's taken issue with all of the criticism he's recieved that has absolutely nothing to do with the quality of his work... It would seem that it's the accusations/ attacks toward DC and personal bullshite toward him that seem to be difficult to ignore. Honestly, who can blame him?

    Criticism is apart of the business, not everyone is going to love your work... Rant, Rave, and get those opinions out! Reserve the personal bullshite for the bathroom wall.


    Submitted by CRiMS0N on Tue, 05/27/2008 - 9:32pm.

    He wasn't talking about critics, NME. Franco is wondering if a few message board loonies will continue this silly vendetta every time they put out a film...cause let's face it, this talkback hasn't been about the film or the review, just a few whiners who want to make things personal.

    I don't think you guys should sweat it. That's the internet. People constantly come and go (unless they're obsessed mental cases with no personal lives, like a certain trailer park retard). I say, have fun with it.


    Submitted by Sirand on Tue, 05/27/2008 - 8:56pm.
    admin moderator NME be fair. They have
    Undeadmin's picture

    NME be fair. They have ignored the critics, the only people causing a problem here are people waiting to take a shot at them.

    There is a handful of people on this site who just love to push each others buttons and everyone one of them has posted in this review.

    MM and Ultimo are just as guilty of instigating as any of you guys are most of the time. You all take shots at each other nonstop.


    Submitted by Undeadmin on Tue, 05/27/2008 - 8:48pm.
    NMEwithin's picture

    Franco: Why not take the professional high-road and just ignore the critics? The more you harp about it the worst you are making it. Why do you bother? I don't get it...


    Submitted by NMEwithin on Tue, 05/27/2008 - 8:32pm.
    moderator Don't worry UF and MM. I'll
    Kryten Syxx's picture

    Don't worry UF and MM. I'll review your films since we all secretly hate each other.


    Submitted by Kryten Syxx on Tue, 05/27/2008 - 8:13pm.

    I'm curious, is this going to happen with every movie we write in the future? 'Cause there are many more on the way. We wrote an even bigger TV project that starts shooting this summer. Are we going to have to be "shown" all over again when that one comes out? What about when Ring Of Death airs on Spike TV in a few months? Are we going to be "shown" then too? None of this makes any sense, of course. Some like it, some don't.


    Submitted by Ultimo Franco on Tue, 05/27/2008 - 7:37pm.
    NMEwithin's picture

    Ban Uncle Creepy...he likes it.


    Submitted by NMEwithin on Tue, 05/27/2008 - 4:36pm.
    admin moderator Come on, no ones getting
    Undeadmin's picture

    Come on, no ones getting banned. Thats the most useless punishment ever in the first place.


    Submitted by Undeadmin on Tue, 05/27/2008 - 3:14pm.
    moderator "I just wanted to show those
    Uncle Creepy's picture

    "I just wanted to show those two"

    Wow, man. You really showed them good.


    Submitted by Uncle Creepy on Tue, 05/27/2008 - 3:06pm.

    And so, while the world's population spirals out of control, men and women continue to die in the name of a pointless war in Iraq, and a global energy and food crisis looms... Someone decides to cut and paste commments into the discussion thread here, from forums elswhere on the web, in order to prove their point about the film "Shark Swarm".

    Geez! :-/


    Submitted by PelusaMG on Tue, 05/27/2008 - 1:19pm.
    frank_dracman's picture

    This will go on longer than the Extended Director's cut of Shark Swarm.

    OOOHHHHH Snap!


    Submitted by frank_dracman on Tue, 05/27/2008 - 11:37am.
    NMEwithin's picture

    This is still going on?


    Submitted by NMEwithin on Tue, 05/27/2008 - 10:56am.

    If you're gonna ban me, ban me. I post at BD now so doesn't make a huge difference. I just wanted to show those two that I was right, and it was to do with the movie's quality more than any dislike for those two.


    Submitted by Fireflyfan on Tue, 05/27/2008 - 7:38am.
    Messiahman's picture

    For anyone in the Los Angeles area, Matt and I will be doing a DVD signing at the great Dark Delicacies in Burbank on Saturday, June 7th. We'll be joined by producer Stephen Niver as well as several of the cast members. Dark Delicacies is the premiere horror book and video store on the West Coast, if not the entire United States, and the event is going to be a blast. The uncut DVD we'll be signing is quite a bit different than the chopped-up cut shown on Hallmark, who scissored out a ton of material and re-edited it quite a bit for their broadcast.

    We'd like to invite anyone in the Los Angeles area to come out and meet us. We guarantee you'll have a shitload of fun, and you'll be supporting a fantastic store. And anyone who doesn't live here can purchase signed DVDs at www.darkdel.com

    Hope to see you there!


    Submitted by Messiahman on Tue, 05/27/2008 - 6:59am.
    moderator Firefly ... and you're
    Uncle Creepy's picture

    Firefly ... and you're posting that here, why? This is a comment from a user on a message board that's on another site. It's becoming increasingly clear that your only intention is to sling mud, stir the pot, and cause trouble. Pull these kind of antics (ie: bringing drama from elsewhere here for no apparent reason other than to try and insult someone) again and you are gone.


    Submitted by Uncle Creepy on Tue, 05/27/2008 - 6:33am.

    Originally Posted by menasyng

    Dude, the flick was worse than a Sci-Fi "Original." The movie sucked, you don't have a "one-up" on anyone because you got something made, if anything you should be embarrassed to be a prime example as to what's wrong with the film industry. Any shitty script can get made into an even shittier film if there might be money in it. Thanks for perpetuating the cycle. The movie sucked, now get over it.

    And that was from a guy who complained about the shark swarm threads getting personal :D

    LOL Rec and Cloverfield don't look so bad now huh?


    Submitted by Fireflyfan on Tue, 05/27/2008 - 4:26am.

    Comment viewing options

    Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.