Rouse III, Richard (The Suffering: Ties That Bind) - Dread Central
Connect with us

News

Rouse III, Richard (The Suffering: Ties That Bind)

Published

on

When The Suffering hit home last year, it came as an unexpected surprise. Here was the type of game horror fans were clamoring for. A game that earned every single bit of its M rating. It had it all! Buckets of gore, inventive creatures, a setting that oozed atmosphere, and a killer storyline. By the time you read this, the sequel to the horror hit will be on store shelves. How will it match the greatness of the original? Our very own Ryan Acheson had a chance to speak with Creative Director and Writer of The Suffering: Ties That Bind, Richard Rouse III, and the results will warm your black little horror loving hearts!


Ryan Acheson: We were big fans of The Suffering here at Dread Central. When looking back on the original, what are the major elements that stand out as having been truly successful, and what are the areas you felt needed improving in the sequel?

Richard Rouse III: We were quite pleased overall with how the first The Suffering turned out and in particular how people reacted to the game so positively. There are two major successes in my mind. The first is the freedom we gave the player in the gameplay. A lot of horror games previous to The Suffering had severely limited what players could do in terms of where they could look, how easily they could move their character, how aggressively they could play, and even how the story could resolve itself. We wanted players to feel they could do what they want, yet still be terrified. The second major success in my mind was in the storytelling. We were trying a lot of new things that we weren’t sure players would like, such as the morality system, the different layers of the back-story, and the historical aspect to the game. As it turned out, players got into the different moral choices in the game. They liked to concoct theories about how Torque got like he is, why he is able to turn into a creature, and so on. Players also seemed to enjoy reading up on the game’s universe through the archives, the notes Torque finds, the chatting companions he meets, and so forth. I’m pleased to say we’ve brought back all those popular elements for Ties That Bind.

In terms of what could be improved, the biggest thing for me was the gameplay balancing. The first game was far too easy, and this actually was detrimental to how frightened players could become while playing it. A big part of tension and suspense in a videogame is fear of dying and losing what you’ve worked so hard to achieve. If the game is too easy, that possibility for fear is taken away. We’ve made sure not to make that mistake this time around, so you’ll definitely notice the game getting significantly harder as you progress through it. And defeating the game on the “Impossible” setting is incredibly hard, to the point where only a few of the developers have managed to do it. I think players will really have their work cut out from them if they’re going to make it through on Impossible and achieve the most positive of the endings.

RA: What aspects of Ties That Bind are you most proud of?

RR: I’m really pleased that we managed to stay true to the tone and story of the first game. Through a lot of agonizing and rewriting, we built on the story of Torque’s life without having to invalidate anything that happened in the first game. We even managed to give players more choice in how the story unfolds this time around through our significantly more involved morality system. I’m also really proud of the way the new Insanity Creature turned out; Torque’s creature form is definitely the best weapon in the game this time around, and his change of appearance and the screen effects on him are incredible. And I’m really proud of the improved look of the environments in the game. The art team at Surreal pulled together and made some amazing stuff. The first game had great looking creatures, and Ties that Bind still has fantastic creatures but now also has amazing environments. It’s a big step forward.

RA: Being able to import your save file from the previous title is a really good idea for a sequel to a game that had a branching storyline, but did it make coming up with a storyline for the sequel even more complicated, and how many different endings did this one need?

RR: I’d say that the story for the sequel is not more complicated, at least not as far as the player is concerned. We toyed with various more complicated stories with oodles more characters, but we eventually whittled it down to something which is fairly simple and matches the complexity of the story in the first game.

However, as you suggest, this time around we’re not only supporting multiple endings, but also multiple beginnings. That did make the story quite a bit more complicated to write. Plus, we needed to have different versions of the endings based on the different beginnings. If you think about it, this makes sense because if you play with the beginning where Torque was framed for killing his wife, you’re going to need a different ending than if you started the game where Torque killed her in cold blood. The event changes Torque’s life so fundamentally, it’s hard to see how the endings wouldn’t have to change as well. The ending of Ties That Bind has two different stages with the first having six different ways it can play out, while the second has five. Furthermore, the writing was still more complicated because we really changed the story throughout the player’s play experience, not just in its ending. So significantly different events will happen in the middle of the game, which meant still more writing. This means the play experience is significantly more tailored to the particular player, so players will, to some extent, make their own stories based on how they play. To players the story won’t seem complicated; it will just seem personal. Which is what I really wanted to achieve.

RA: A lot of what made The Suffering stand out was its prison-based setting, but now that we’ve had a few other games with similar settings, was the decision to go somewhere else with the sequel a story-based one or did it have more to do with the fact that it had already been done?

RR: It wasn’t so much that other games had done a prison setting; it was more that we had already done a prison setting. When you’re doing a sequel, you want to keep your audience interested by setting the game somewhere new, but you also actually want to keep yourself as developers interested by varying up the scenery. While players may play a game over a course of a few weeks, developers are faced with the same game for two or more years. After two years of prisons you really do want to see something different in your digital environments, just to keep your creative spark going. Developers who are facing new challenges — whether new game mechanics, new technology, or new environments — are more likely to do really compelling work than if they’re just rehashing things they have done before.

Fortunately, going to the city of Baltimore also perfectly fit with the storyline we wanted to tell. Torque’s from Baltimore, so a lot of the places from Torque’s life that were mentioned in the first game actually come to life in Ties That Bind. So we knew we were doing the right thing for the game while also providing ourselves with a change of scenery, which is always nice.

RA: Was it difficult to keep the game tense going out into more open environments than those allowed by a claustrophobic prison? Which of the new environments do you think best fit The Suffering?

RR: It was a big challenge making open streets work for a horror title like this. In the first game some of the most intense and disturbing spaces were also the most claustrophobic, which is not what you necessarily think of with the streets of Baltimore. But since most of the game takes place after a cataclysm has rocked the city (whereby the monsters that were once on Carnate Island are now running lose on the city streets), we were able to force the player down narrow alleys, tight canals, and abandoned tunnels beneath the city to provide a mix of the more open and more claustrophobic spaces. In the end, my favorite environment has to be the streets of Baltimore because they look so authentic and they fit so perfectly with Torque’s past. But there’s also the Grand Theater, where Dr. Killjoy holds court and the player first has a real encounter with his new nemesis, Blackmore.

RA: Are people that know Baltimore going to recognize any of the city?

RR: I think so. One of our lead environment artists lived in Baltimore for a number of years, and he was dedicated to making sure we maintained authenticity. Baltimore is a very distinct and interesting city with a specific vibe and feel, whether it’s the omni-present row houses, the grand old movie palaces that are still operational, or the brutally run down poorest neighborhoods. As bleak as some of these places are, I think players will definitely recognize them. And there won’t be any doubt that they belong in a horror game.

RA: Given that so much was made of the Stan Winston designed creatures in the original, I’m surprised only a handful of them are being brought back. The new monsters are definitely on a par with anything in the first game, but was there any pressure to keep as much of what Stan had designed as possible?

RR: On the first game Stan worked as a consultant, looking over our creature designs and making some suggestions for how they could be improved and so forth. All of the creatures were primarily designed internally by our character artists, though Stan’s input was useful, and we came up with some really cool creatures because of it.

However, I wouldn’t say not that many are coming back. Of the seven primary creatures from the first game, four of them are coming back in Ties That Bind. All these creatures have had a significant facelift, but you’ll still recognize old favorites like the Slayer, Burrower, and Mainliner. There was no real pressure to keep the old creatures from outside forces, it was more that we wanted to bring back the old favorites to keep the game feeling distinctly like The Suffering.

As you mention, I think the new creatures really are on par with the old ones. That’s because we have our same creature artist designing the creatures this time around as on the first game. One of my favorite new creatures is the Mauler, which is a dog-beast with a human head who hunts in packs. Our character artist has been drawing dogs with human heads for years, and we felt it was time to finally put one of them in a game. And I guarantee you’ll be impressed with the results.

RA: The creatures in the original were based around the various ways in which we have executed our criminals whereas in Ties That Bind they’re based more on urban social ills. How exactly do you go about developing something like poverty into a monster?

RR: In a way, the new creatures are based around execution methods as well; it’s just somewhat more indirect. But at the same time, these creatures and their subject matter are even more evil and disturbing. For instance, the number of people killed by lethal injection every year is dwarfed by the number of people who starve to death. Certainly the number of people killed by drug addiction greatly outstrips the numbers executed by any means. So, if you start to really think about the creatures and their subject matter, I suspect you’ll find them even more disturbing than the ones from the first game.

Still, though, you’re right: Trying to capture some of those concepts in a creature design can be quite a challenge. Some topics, like poverty, we just avoided because we knew it’d be impossible to make a creature that could really got that across. However, something like starvation is a lot easier to do, and we made exactly such a creature with The Gorger. He’s got spindly little legs with a distended potbelly and a gigantic jaw. He’s also constantly feeding off of corpses, which ties in his appearance with his actions. We chose the subject matter for our creatures very carefully, so you get cool creatures who also tie into the themes of the game perfectly.

RA: Given that the game offers both 3rd and 1st person viewpoints, does that complicate things when it comes to designing scary moments, and what do you think each viewpoint offers the player in terms of tension and atmosphere?

RR: It does sometimes. We’ve definitely had situations where we had to do two different sets of scripting for a particular scare, one for when players are in first person and one for when they’re in third. It can be a challenge, but we think it’s worth it. The switchable views are not so much about tension or atmosphere as they are about giving players the choice to play the game however they want. That’s been one of our guiding principles from the beginning, and though it’s often easier to give players fewer choices, in the end players will thank you for being able to play the game how they want.

RA: The Suffering is most known for its horrific action, but can we still hope to see some of the creepy quieter moments leading up to that?

RR: Absolutely. Good horror in any medium is all about pacing. The first game we weren’t entirely thrilled with how the pacing turned out, particularly toward the end where it got a bit repetitious. I think Ties That Bind is paced a lot better, so you’re still getting quiet moments and the scares associated with them all the way until the end of the game, and right when you’re least expecting it, a massive battle will start.

RA: The monstrosities that Torque turns into are apparently much more useful this time. How do the three different beasts impact the gameplay, and are you making sure that they’re useful as opposed to just necessary from time to time?

RR: We spent a lot of time redesigning Torque’s creature form for Ties That Bind. We really liked the concept of the creature from the last game but felt we could do better this time around, in particular in terms of game balancing. Through our focus testing early on, coupled with what we’d read on the message boards, we knew not that many players actually used the creature that much. In point of fact, they didn’t need to use it to make it through the game because there was so much projectile ammo scattered around and because the projectile weapons were often more powerful than the creature. So our mantra this time around was to rework the creature and definitively make the beast the “best weapon in the game.”

And I have to say it really is a lot more effective and exciting to play. And with the way we’ve balanced the game, players will need to use the creature just to survive. We’ve also added certain creatures that can only be killed while in insanity mode and certain obstacles that can only be removed by the creature. But the best thing about the reworked creature is that it actually changes its form based on the player’s current morality path in the game. Throughout the game players are able to make key decisions that alter the story and steer the player toward one of our multiple endings. The creature is now tied in to that, changing both in appearance and in terms of gameplay. The attacks he can perform change radically based on the player’s moral path. This is really exciting because replaying the game and following a different moral path will have a substantially different gameplay experience. There are nine different states to the creature’s special attacks with the attacks increasing in power as the player trends toward the more extreme ends of the moral spectrum.

With the way we’ve balanced the game, the creature will definitely be necessary to playing effectively, particularly on the harder difficulties. With all those new features, however, I think players will really want to use the creature mode in Ties That Bind. I really do think we succeed in making it the best weapon in the game.

RA: Are there any games or films that have come out since The Suffering that were inspirational or served as a reference title for the sequel?

RR: Not too many, a few. I finally got to see the Japanese film The Grudge and then its American remake, both of which I thought were quite good.

There’s a great little-known independent movie called Deepwater that I saw at the Seattle International Film Festival. It’s really more of a thriller than a horror movie, but it had a great psychological spin and visual style to it that inspired what we were doing. We were actually fairly far into development when I saw it, but it encouraged me to put in some last minute touches that play into Torque’s dementia.

There’s also a great British movie called The Descent that is one of the best horror films I’ve seen in a while, though this can’t really be considered an inspiration since it only came out when we were basically in bug-fixing mode. Certainly a great movie though, well worth checking out.

In terms of getting at the Baltimore setting, I had been a fan of the TV show Homicide: Life on the Street for years, but doing research on this game, I finally got to see The Wire, which is truly David Simon’s masterpiece. And a TV miniseries that was a great inspiration was Simon’s The Corner, an unsensationalized, authentic story of the life in an impoverished and drug ravaged Baltimore neighborhood. It’s really grim and depressing stuff, which made it ideal inspiration for a horror game, particularly something as disturbing and upsetting as The Suffering: Ties That Bind.


Big thanks to Tara Monahan at Midway Home Entertainment for her help in setting this up and, of course, Richard Rouse III for his time!

Discuss The Suffering: Ties That Bind in our forums.

Get this site 100% Ad Free Support Us on Patreon!
Continue Reading
Comments

News

Horror Movies to Be Thankful for on Thanksgiving

Published

on

After you’ve gorged on your Thanksgiving feast and the L-tryptophan is kicking in, you’re probably thinking about parking your carcass on the couch and watching movie after movie. But not just any movie – this is a holiday, so naturally you want to celebrate on-topic and gobble some gore.

We’ve got you covered with this curated list of choices from a 25-item menu of Native American-themed thrillers and chillers.

Death Curse of Tartu (1966)

A group of students on an archaeology assignment in the Everglades decide to throw a dance party one night. The spot they choose happens to be the burial site of an ancient Seminole shaman named Tartu. He returns from the dead to take his revenge on those who desecrated his grave site.


Stanley (1972)

A Seminole Vietnam vet (Chris Robinson) goes on the warpath when a leather goods merchant (Alex Rocco) tries to grab his pet snake Stanley to turn him into a belt. A William Grefe cult classic!


Hex (1973)

Set on the Nebraska prairie in the immediate aftermath of World War I, the story follows the spiritual clash between the daughters of a recently deceased shaman and a gang of ex-aviators. Christina Raines, Scott Glenn and Keith Carradine star in this largely unknown, bizarre body-count thriller.


Shadow of the Hawk (1976)

A Canadian Indian (Jan-Michael Vincent) and a newswoman (Marilyn Hassett) join his grandfather (Chief Dan George) on a tribal walk among evil spirits.


The Manitou (1978)

A psychic (Tony Curtis) recruits a witch doctor (Michael Ansara) to get a 400-year-old Indian medicine man off his girlfriend’s (Susan Strasberg) back…. literally. The demonic Native American spirit is a tumor trying to reincarnate.


Prophecy (1979)

When a dispute occurs between a logging operation and a nearby Native American tribe, Dr. Robert Verne (Robert Foxworth) and his wife, Maggie (Talia Shire), are sent in to mediate. Chief John Hawks (Armand Assante) becomes enraged when Robert captures a bear cub for testing, but he’s not as angry as the mutant grizzly mom! George Clutesi plays an Original Person who believes the monster is the personification of the god Katahdin and is there to protect the land.


Nightwing (1979)

A policeman (Nick Mancuso), his girlfriend (Kathryn Harrold) and a scientist (David Warner) track vampire bats on a Maski tribe reservation. Abner Tasupi (George Clutesi) is the shaman who helps them.


Wolfen (1981)

A New York cop (Albert Finney) investigates a series of brutal deaths that resemble animal attacks. His hunt leads him to Native American high worker Eddie Holt (Edward James Olmos) to see if there’s any connection between the killings and old myths and legends from the area. Finney’s character refers to as “the Crazy Horse of the Seventies… the only one of our local militants left alive who’s not making money off of Levi’s commercials.”


Scalps (1983)

Hapless college science students go on a dig around a sacred burial ground for artifacts. Unfortunately, one of them becomes possessed by the evil spirit of Black Claw… and that means only one thing: Now he must slaughter all of his friends.


Eyes of Fire (1983)

Almost lynched in 1750, a preacher (Dennis Lipscomb) leads his followers (Guy Boyd, Rebecca Stanley) west to a valley whose dirt holds a devil of Indian origin.


Firestarter (1984)

Pyrokinetic protagonist Charlie McGee (Drew Barrymore) is in trouble when an evil Native American named Rainbird (George C. Scott) wants to kill her because he is convinced her death would give him special power to take to the mystical other world of his ancestors.


Poltergeist 2: The Other Side (1986)

The Freeling family have a new house, but their troubles with supernatural forces are not over. Whoops, looks like it’s another haunted Native American resting place!


Creepshow 2 (1987)

In the anthology film’s first vignette, “Old Chief Wood’nhead,” thugs who terrorize small-store grocers played by Dorothy Lamour and George Kennedy are attacked in kind by the general store’s wooden Indian.


Pet Sematary (1989)

After moving to an idyllic home in the countryside, life seems perfect for the Creed family…but not for long. Louis and Rachel Creed and their two young children settle into a house that sits next door to a pet cemetery – built on an ancient Indian burial ground.


Ravenous (1999)

Capt. John Boyd (Guy Pearce) is sent to investigate reports of missing persons at Fort Spencer, a remote Army outpost on the Western frontier. After arriving at his new post, Boyd and his regiment aid a wounded frontiersman, F.W. Colghoun (Robert Carlyle), who recounts a horrifying tale of a wagon train murdered by its supposed guide — a vicious U.S. Army colonel gone rogue… and who’s developed a taste for human flesh.


Brotherhood of the Wolf (2001)

In 18th century France, the Chevalier de Fronsac and his Native American friend Mani (Mark Dascosos) of the Micmac tribe are sent by the King to the Gevaudan province to investigate the killings of hundreds by a mysterious beast.


The Wendigo (2001)

Director Larry Fessenden movie uses the Native American Wendigo legend to tell an eerie and hallucinogenic tale about a family trapped in the woods with a dark force.


“Masters of Horror: Deer Woman” (2005)

A burned-out cop believes that a recent string of murders prove that the killer might be a deer-like creature in the form of a beautiful woman (Cinthia Moura) come to life from a local Native American folklore legend.


Skinwalkers (2006)

A 12-year-old boy and his mother become the targets of two warring werewolf packs, each with different intentions and motives. Based on the folk legend from Utah about the spirits of murdered Indians returning to seek revenge upon those who disrespect the land.


The Burrowers (2008)

A search party – played by Clancy Brown, William Mapother and Doug Hutchison – sets out to find and recover a family of settlers that has mysteriously vanished from their home. Expecting the offenders to be a band of fierce natives, the group prepares for a routine battle. But they soon discover that the real enemy stalks them from below.


The Dead Can’t Dance (2010)

Three Native Americans discover they are immune to a zombie virus in this whacky indie comedy.


Savaged (2013)

After thugs brutalize a deaf-mute woman (Amanda Adrienne), the spirit of an Apache warrior takes over her lifeless body and sets out on a bloodthirsty quest for revenge.


Volcano Zombies (2014)

Danny Trejo as a Native American who warns campers about the legendary and very angry lava-laden “volcano zombies.”


The Darkness (2016)

Peter Taylor (Kevin Bacon), his wife and their two children return to Los Angeles after a fun-filled vacation to the Grand Canyon. Strange events soon start to plague the family, and the Taylors learn that Michael brought back some mysterious rocks that he discovered inside an ancient Native American cave.


Mohawk

Mohawk (2017)

After one of her tribe sets an American soldiers’ camp ablaze, a young female Mohawk finds herself pursued by a ruthless band of renegades bent on revenge. Fleeing deep into the woods, Mohawk youths Oak and Calvin confront the bloodthirsty Colonel Holt and his soldiers. As the Americans seem to close in from all sides, the trio must summon every resource both real and supernatural as the brutal attack escalates. Mohawk is a dark, political drama with horror undertones. “While set 203 years ago, Mohawk is unfortunately a timeless story,” says director Ted Geoghegan. “It’s about marginalized people being decimated simply because they exist and scared white men who fail to realize that their racism and bigotry will place them on the wrong side of history.

Get this site 100% Ad Free Support Us on Patreon!
Continue Reading

News

Paul Feig On Why His Ghostbusters Reboot Failed

Published

on

It’s pretty obvious at this point that director Paul Feig’s reboot of Ivan Reitman’s classic horror-comedy Ghostbusters wasn’t the success anyone was looking for.

Not fans. Not the studio. And certainly not Feig.

The director of the 2016 Ghostbusters reboot recently spoke with Cinema Blend about the film and made a few comments about why he believes the film wasn’t the smashing success it should have been.

“I think it kind of hampered us a little bit because the movie became so much of a cause,” Feig told the site. “I think for some of our audience, they were like, ‘What the fuck? We don’t wanna go to a cause. We just wanna watch a fuckin’ movie.’ … It was a great regret in my life that the movie didn’t do better, ’cause I really loved it. It’s not a perfect movie. None of my movies are perfect. I liked what we were doing with it. It was only supposed to be there to entertain people.”

Meh. Could be, Feig. That or the film was just not funny or spooky enough to satisfy new or old fans. It was too middle ground and we all know how those kinds of films go over.

That said, I didn’t hate the reboot.

I thought Kristen Wiig and Kate McKinnon were delightful and I’ll take more Slimer however I can get him. But as always, I just wish there had been more of him. Sigh.

What do you make of Feig’s comments on his Ghostbusters film? Do you think it was “the cause” that keep the reboot from being a smash hit? Let us know in the comments below!

You buy the film on Blu-ray HERE and the original classic HERE.

Synopsis:

Following a ghost invasion of Manhattan, paranormal enthusiasts Erin Gilbert and Abby Yates, nuclear engineer Jillian Holtzmann, and subway worker Patty Tolan band together to stop the otherworldly threat.

Get this site 100% Ad Free Support Us on Patreon!
Continue Reading

News

First Plot Details on Quentin Tarantino’s Sharon Tate Movie

Published

on

When we first heard about the upcoming ninth film by Quentin Tarantino, it came with the rumor that the film would be centered around the recently deceased Charles Manson.

Tarantino then debunked the rumor saying the film was not about Manson but about the year 1969 in general. Whatever that means.

Today we (might) have a better idea of just what he meant by that as a recent article by Vanity Fair may have just revealed the plot of Tarantino’s mysterious film.

The site’s synopsis reads:

Set in Los Angeles in the summer of 1969, Tarantino’s upcoming movie, according to a source who read the script, focuses on a male TV actor who’s had one hit series and his looking for a way to get into the film business. His sidekick—who’s also his stunt double—is looking for the same thing. The horrific murder of Sharon Tate and four of her friends by Charles Manson’s cult of followers serves as a backdrop to the main story.

Stunt double?

And just like that I could give a sh*t about the whole “is it, or isn’t it about Manson?” debate and now all I want to know is “will the film be, or not be about Stuntman Mike and/or his older brother Stuntman Bob?”

Am I joking? Maybe. But this is Tarantino after all. And the man loves building up his own connected universe of films and characters so… you never know…

How excited are you for Tarantino’s new movie? Does this plot sound correct to you? Make sure to hit us up and let us know in the comments below or on social media!

Tarantino’s ninth film is expected to start shooting in LA this June.

Get this site 100% Ad Free Support Us on Patreon!
Continue Reading

Go Ad Free!

Support Dread Central on Patreon!

Join the Box of Dread Mailing List

* indicates required

From Around the Web

Trending