Exclusive: In-Depth with Ryan Levin on Some Guy Who Kills People - Dread Central
Connect with us

Exclusive: In-Depth with Ryan Levin on Some Guy Who Kills People

Published

on

Post Thumb:

/jul11/someguy.jpg

It started with a tweet. I have no idea who put said tweet in my feed, but in that feed there was a trailer for a film that sounded so vague that admittedly my curiosity was piqued. The name? Some Guy Who Kills People.

Written by Ryan Levin, directed by Jack Perez and starring Kevin Corrigan, Some Guy Who Kills People tells the story of Ken Boyd, a lonely man fresh out of the loony bin who sets out to kill those he deems responsible for his miserable life.

Using the powers of Twitter, I reached out to writer Ryan Levin and this is what happened…

Crix: Where did the idea for SGWKP come about?

Ryan Levin: The idea came from a short film I made in 2007 called “The Fifth,” in which a group of buddies hang out, play poker and shoot the shit about their jobs. One of the guys, this totally unassuming and “Everyday Joe” guy, happens to be a serial killer, of which his friends are all fully aware. Once that short was done and making the festival rounds, I began to think about creating a feature with a likable serial killer protagonist.

Crix: When you were writing the role of Ken, did you have a specific vision (i.e., Kevin), or did you have a wish list of who you wanted to play him?

RL: Originally I based the character on the actor who played him in the short film, Sam Lloyd, who is one of the most under-appreciated comedic actors I know. But as the story began to develop, and Ken’s life and history began to form, his character became younger. And since I knew we were going to have to raise the money to make this film, I began to think of “name” actors who could play the role, and as the vision of Ken’s physicality and age and mentality changed, so did the way I wrote his character. I guess I kind of wrote it with a hybrid of “name” actors in mind.

Crix: As a writer, how difficult is it to find the balance between horror and comedy?

RL: I write comedy. Now, whether what I write is funny or not, that’s not for me to say. But I’m a comedy writer. However, I always lean towards the darker side of comedy, writing comedy about darker subjects. Neither comedy nor writing in general comes easily to me, but when I think about writing any other genre, it seems that much more difficult. And I have absolutely no interest in writing for certain genres, like drama or action/adventure. I’ll watch them, but I have no desire to write those types of films. Horror, however, is different. I would love to write a truly scary “shit-your-pants” horror film because I’ve always loved horror films and the emotions they stir up in me. But I’m not sure I can write a straight horror film that has audiences burying their heads in their lovers’ shoulders. So I tend to take horror elements, or dark subjects, and write them as comedies. Some Guy Who Kills People is not anything like Shaun of the Dead, but nobody would call Shaun of the Dead scary. They would call it a comedy about a horror film subject. That is what I wanted to do with Some Guy. However, finding that balance was the toughest part of the writing process because the script would always drift too far in one direction or the other, and I knew that if you’re going to blend genres, it needs to be a consistent and seamless blend (Fargo being the paradigm for me) where the audience can be scared in one scene and laughing in the next scene… but the film had to thread this genre-blend throughout. I didn’t want a funny Act One, a serious Act Two and some weird amalgam in Act Three. The blurring and balancing of genres was far and away my biggest challenge. I still needed it to feel like the same movie.



Crix: When I saw the trailer, I went from “ha ha” to “holy fuck” in a matter of seconds… Have you gotten to see the film with a crowd yet? What’s been the reaction?

RL: I’ve certainly been in many screenings of the film. One thing I’ve noticed pretty consistently is that the audience doesn’t initially know if it’s okay to laugh. They’re trying to figure out what the film is. Usually when you sit down for a movie, you know what type of film you’re seeing (and with studio films you usually know a lot more than just the genre – you know the whole damn story). But because of our title a lot of people come in expecting a particular type of film. Then, pretty quickly, as the genres blend, the audience is left to decipher what “type” of film this is. Usually the first laugh, wherever it falls, gives the rest of the audience permission to laugh. Then, in the more successful screenings, the audience will laugh at the jokes but be totally patient and interested when the jokes aren’t flying and the tone temporarily shifts before shifting back.

Crix: How difficult (if at all) is it to transition from writing for TV (like “Scrubs”) to writing a feature film?

RL: As far as feature writing, I only have personal experience with indie films. I know a good deal about what goes on with writing for studio films, but it’s all second-hand knowledge. When it comes to writing an indie film, unless you have producers telling you what to write, you are free to do whatever the fuck you want. You want to forgo the 3-act structure, go ahead. You want to have an unlikable lead, do it. You want to write a movie about transgender nuns who live in igloos, by all means… Now, this of course is simply the creative aspect of it. The goal still remains getting the movie made (unless you want to write just for sake of writing, which is fine, too), and some of your creative ideas will help or hinder that aspect. But as far as simply writing, there is the ultimate freedom to write what you want to write. Of course, there are screenplay rules which can be broken, but you better have a good reason for breaking them or else you risk making an inaccessible film that will remain a script forever (unless you fund it yourself or find an investor who digs inaccessible films). I should point out for those who have just emerged from a cave that feature films are longer than TV shows. So you need a story that can sustain at 80-plus minutes. With TV the story needs to sustain 22 minutes (network comedy) or 44 minutes (network drama), and then you’re on to the next episode, which often has nothing to do with the previous episode. With features the audience is spending more time with the plot, with the characters, with the stakes of the story, so you have to hold their attention longer.

Crix: Your film is filled with some serious comedic and horror talent like Barry Bostwick, Lucy Davis and Karen Black (omg, how awesome); how did you get all these wonderful people (I almost said ‘toys’ haha)?

RL: The short answer is that we were lucky. When you have the tiny budget we had, you can’t afford to pay great actors what they deserve, and you won’t be getting great actors who don’t like the project but need the money. We all agreed to pursue Kevin Corrigan to play the lead and just hoped he would respond to the script. Fortunately, he did. As far as Barry Bostwick, Karen Black and Lucy Davis, they all auditioned for the role. Our awesome casting director, Lisa Essary, got them to come in to read for their parts. They all had incredible auditions that made it clear to us that not only were they names people would know, but they also happened to be the best actors for their respective roles. What they each did in their auditions was take what was on the page and bring their own wholly original and unorthodox take. They elevated what was on the page, and the choice to cast each of them couldn’t have been simpler.

Crix: There’s also a lot of buzz around Ariel Gade’s role as Amy… Were there aspects of the film she had to be shielded from, and has she seen the finished product? Was there ever a time/scene on set where her mom/dad said, ‘Yeah, no’?

RL: I’ve said it before — we got the best young actress in Hollywood. Again, we simply lucked out. She auditioned, and while other young actresses were solid, Ariel blew them all out of the water. So from an acting standpoint she’s incredible. Then there are these other issues to deal with when casting a child: their comfort level on set, their ability to take direction, their ability to handle the dialogue, their ability to handle the subject matter, and, of course, their parents’ involvement in all of this.

Not one of these things ever became even the slightest issue. From moment one Ariel was completely confident on set (or faked it extremely well); she took direction and made adjustments like she’d been doing this for 20 years; she either understood every scene completely or would ask intelligent questions so that she did understand; and the subject matter never seemed to faze her or her parents one bit. For her and her parents, it was like we were shooting Flipper 2. Ariel is a product of both her own desire to study the craft of acting for its own sake, her parents’ ability to be the complete opposite of “stage parents,” and their decision to ensure Ariel chooses projects that will help her become a better actress. In the case of this movie, she got a master class from the likes of Kevin, Barry, Karen and Lucy.

Crix: Would you do (or are you doing) another horror film?

RL: To be honest, Some Guy Who Kills People is not a horror movie per se. It’s a dark comedy with horror elements. But yes, I would love to write a horror movie. The one I’m writing now is big rompy horror-comedy, but I’d like to try my hand at writing a straight horror film where the intention is to scare, not elicit laughs.

Crix: What advice would you give to others who’re just “stepping off the bus” and want to make it in this town as a writer?

RL: Sorry, but it’s the most obvious answer: write. Then keep writing. And when you have something that is truly good – that you’ve gotten extensive notes on, that you’ve rewritten and improved, that honest people are telling you is good – then try to get it in front of those damn gatekeepers – agents, managers, producers, etc. But if the quality of writing isn’t there, you may blow an opportunity.

Stephen King said, “If you want to be a writer, you must do two things above all others: read a lot and write a lot.” I’m guilty of not reading enough because I always think, instead of reading, I should just be writing. But there have been countless times when reading something has gotten me through writer’s block or birthed a new idea or taught me something to help me be a better writer… So, yeah, I have to force myself to read more, but I never regret it. And I definitely never regret writing, even on the shittiest of writing days.

Crix: Who/what are your influences?

RL: I’m definitely influenced by certain Coen Brother films, specifically Fargo and Raising Arizona. Their penchant for seamlessly blending genres while writing smart and thoroughly entertaining films.

On the horror side, Halloween continues to be my my favorite film of all time. Part of that is nostalgia, and part of that is how it remains frightening, despite its simplicity. I never plan on writing drama, but if I did (or could), I can’t think of ever writing anything as amazing as “Breaking Bad”. There is also an amazing Argentinian mini-series called “Epitafios”, which somehow flew completely below the radar. The writing, subject matter and sheer entertainment value in those two series are remarkable.

However, my real wish is that I were Martin McDonagh, the brilliant Irish playwright, who also wrote and directed the film In Bruges. His ability to mine comedy from the darkest situations and to create despicable characters we can’t help but love astounds me. Often times his funniest stuff is on the level of two brothers arguing about who ate the last of the tea biscuits. Of course, they’ll later end up murdering each other in some grotesque way. He gets comedy from every little detail, then he gets comedy from the sheer horror of what people will do to each other. And yet this horror is somehow hilarious. He crafts each and every line so well that even just reading it off the page, I can hear the line being delivered; then I either laugh hysterically, shake my head in awe, or throw the book across the room, disgusted by the fact that I’ll never be that good. I can’t think of another writer who is batting 1.000 in my book. Plus, Irish accents are just funnier than American accents.

Crix: What was your first horror film and how old were you?

RL: For some reason, when I was about 5 years old, my mom rented me the original Friday the 13th. She could have gotten Pete’s Dragon or Fantasia or something remotely kid-friendly, but somehow, she came home with Friday the 13th. She certainly wasn’t a horror fan, but she must have known from the box that this wasn’t a kid’s movie. I had heard of it but knew little about it. When it became clear she was actually going to let me watch it, that this wasn’t some sort of sick and twisted test, I popped it into the VCR and was hooked. It was just so much damn fun. And hey, Parents Council — I never went out and tried to slice my friend’s head off with a machete. I knew it was a movie. A movie that would begin my love affair with horror.

Crix: What film still creeps you out to this day?

RL: It is so rare that I watch anything that truly creeps me out, that burrows its way to my marrow. Not because I’m some tough guy but because crafting something truly scary is just so hard to do. Fear is what we don’t know, which means crafting something scary requires leaving things out that would deflate the tension and terror (hence, why Jaws is scarier when we only see his dorsal fin). However, there is one thing that will forever give me chills, even in just thinking about it, and that’s the opening to the original When a Stranger Calls. The rest of that film is shit, but the opening is pure terror. “Have you checked the children?” “We’ve traced the call. It’s coming from inside the house.” I saw that when I was 11, and it kept me up for several nights. I think it still could.

Crix: How important are ‘test audiences’ (if you had one)?

RL: We actually gathered a group of about 50 people (friends of friends with no connection to show business) and showed them a rough cut. We handed out anonymous surveys afterwards, and that feedback was beyond helpful. We looked at the issues that were mentioned several times and went back into editing with those in mind. Or, even if one person offered a great idea, we used it. You get too close to the movie and you need that objectivity. Doing that test screening was hugely helpful for us, and I would encourage all filmmakers to find a way to make one happen (with an audience who is free to be honest).

Crix: Where can we find the festival circuit schedule for SGWKP, and will it get a mainstream release as well?

RL: The best places to go for info on screenings are:

a) Please sign up for the mailing list. We won’t spam you.

b) I’m on the Facebook page every day interacting with fans and posting screening info, behind-the-scenes content, running contest giveaways, etc.

c) Twitter of course! Again, that’s just me, interacting with the fans, and I love it.

As far as the film’s U.S. distribution, we are closing a deal now, which will make the film available on every single media platform starting… well, that I don’t know. Hopefully within the first couple months of 2012. The film won’t be released theatrically into your multiplexes, but it will screen at arthouse theaters across the country – sometimes for a night, sometimes for a week. It all depends on whether people go see it. And again, all of these screenings, whether at festivals or arthouse cinemas, will be posted on our Facebook page, and through the website, mailing list and blog.

Crix: What’s the one thing you want people to say about SGWKP?

RL: Very good question. I guess I want them to say they thought it was extremely funny, that they were never bored, and that it was, in many ways, original. Maybe that’s asking for too much. One thing I do love hearing is, “I loved the film, but it’s even better the second time.”

Exclusive: In-Depth with Ryan Levin on Some Guy Who Kills People

VISIT THE EVILSHOP @ AMAZON!
Got news? Click here to submit it!
Meet some other guys in the comments section below!

Image Type 1:

Get this site 100% Ad Free Support Us on Patreon!
Continue Reading
Comments

News

Exclusive: Rocky Gray Talks Halloween Horror Anthology 10/31

Published

on

The last time we gave you guys word on the upcoming Halloween horror anthology 10/31 was to bring you the knock-out exclusive official poster, which you can peep to your left (click for a higher-res version).

The new horror anthology in the vein of V/H/S and Creepshow joins an ensemble cast together to spin twisted tales of the macabre. The film is executive produced by P.J. Starks, creator of the critically acclaimed Volumes of Blood.

The film’s stories are directed by the likes of Justin M. Seaman (The Barn), Zane Hershberger (Devilution), John William Holt (The Dooms Chapel Horror), Brett DeJager (Bonejangles) and Rocky Gray making his directing debut.

This past weekend we were able to catch up with producer-director Rocky Gray and ask him a few choice questions about the anticipated upcoming anthology film.

You can check out our quick interview below and then make sure to hit us up and let us know how excited you are to check out 10/31 in the comments below!

Dread Central: How is the film coming along?

Rocky Gray: The film is now completed and we are getting the perks out to our Indiegogo backers. The backers and Death By Festival got to see the first cut of the film in October and they loved it so we’re very excited to get the film out to everyone else very soon.

DC: What can expect from this anthology?

RG: Expect to have a lot of Halloween themed fun. Each segment has its own flavor so the pacing and the look change throughout the film. With masked killers, vampires, scarecrows, tricksters and old hags there’s something for everyone.

DC: Will there be a sequel?

RG: If there was a demand for it we would make it happen!

Sounds good to us. Thanks for chatting with us, Rocky!

You can become a fan of the film on Facebook HERE.

SYNOPSIS:
A Halloween treat bag of all the things that go bump in the night. From masked killers to scarecrows, witches, and tricksters. There’s a scare for everyone in this anthology of horror and the macabre from the creators of The Barn and Volumes of Blood.

Red Letter Entertainment, Inc. brings you the directorial debut from Rocky Gray (composer of The Barn, Killing Floor 2), two-time Grammy-winning musician and former drummer for Evanescence. A new horror anthology in the vein of V/H/S/ and Creepshow brings an ensemble cast together to spin twisted tales of the macabre. The film is Executive Produced by P.J. Starks, creator of the critically acclaimed Volumes of Blood.

Get this site 100% Ad Free Support Us on Patreon!
Continue Reading

News

The Duffer Brothers Have Begun Working on Stranger Things 3

Published

on

I wasn’t the world’s biggest fan of the first season of Netflix and The Duffer Brothers’ “Stranger Things” to tell you the truth. That said, I absolutely loved the second season (read our reviews HERE).

It is with this in mind that we are all looking forward to “Stranger Things 3”.

Recently Deadline reported that at Vulture Festival LA the Duffer Brothers, producer Shawn Levy, Finn Wolfhard, Paul Reiser, and Linnea Berthelsen talked about season two and teased season three.

“We are [in] very early days on season three, and we’re still figuring it out,” Ross Duffer said, before taking a beat, then adding: “I probably wasn’t supposed to say that. That’s not official; that wasn’t an official announcement — we’re just working on it, just for our own amusement… for fun!”

Whatever.

We all know at this point that there is going to be a “Stranger Things 3” and that The Duffer Brothers will one day begin working on it. Don’t worry so much, Ross Duffer.

After all, your brother already let us know that season three will begin after a time jump:

“Even if we wanted to hop into the action faster, we couldn’t,” says Matt Duffer. “Our kids are aging. We can only write and produce the show so fast. They’re going to be almost a year older by the time we start shooting season three. It provides certain challenges. You can’t start right after season two ended. It forces you to do a time jump. It’s a long way of saying that yeah, we’re going to do a time jump.”

What did you think of “Stranger Things 2”? Did you dig it more (or less) than season one? Make sure to hit us up and let us know in the comments below or on social media!

“Stranger Things 2” is currently streaming on Netflix.

Synopsis:
It’s 1984, and the citizens of Hawkins, Indiana, are still reeling from the horrors of the Demogorgon and the secrets of Hawkins Lab. Will Byers has been rescued from the Upside Down, but a bigger, sinister entity still threatens those who survived.

Get this site 100% Ad Free Support Us on Patreon!
Continue Reading

News

James Cameron’s Terminator Reboot/Sequel Hires Screenwriter

Published

on

The last word we brought you guys on producer James Cameron and Deadpool-director Tim Miller’s new Terminator film was when we let you know that Paramount had set the film’s release date for July 26, 2019.

Today we have news via The Wrap that the studio is bringing in screenwriter Billy Ray (Captain Phillips) to pen the movie’s script based on a story crafted by Cameron.

You may remember that Cameron and Miller created a writers room a while back to plan out an all-new trilogy of films, but while that writer’s room included David Goyer, Charles Eglee, and Josh Friedman, it seems like Ray will be the first film’s sole writer. For now.

Story details are, of course, being kept under wraps, but Cameron and Miller are treating the new movie as a direct sequel to Cameron’s T2: Judgment Day.

“This is a continuation of the story from ‘Terminator 1’ and ‘Terminator 2.’ And we’re pretending the other films were a bad dream,” Cameron told THR. “Or an alternate timeline, which is permissible in our multi-verse.”

We also know that Cameron plans to center the new film/trilogy around a new group of younger characters, who will eventually carry on the baton as it were.

“A lot of this is handing off the baton to a new generation of characters,” Cameron said. “We’re starting a search for an 18-something young woman to essentially be the new centerpiece of these stories. And then a number of other characters around her and characters from the future. We still fold time in the story in intriguing ways. But we have Arnold’s character and Linda’s character to anchor it.”

How excited are you for James Cameron’s new Terminator flick? Make sure to hit us up and let us know in the comments below or on social mdeia!

The new Terminator film is produced by James Cameron and will be directed by Tim Miller (Deadpool). The film stars Arnold Schwarzenegger and Linda Hamilton.

Terminator 2.5 is expected to hit July 26, 2019.

Get this site 100% Ad Free Support Us on Patreon!
Continue Reading

Go Ad Free!

Support Dread Central on Patreon!

Join the Box of Dread Mailing List

* indicates required

From Around the Web

Trending

Copyright © 2017 Dread Central Media LLC