Writer/Director Andrew Barker Talks A Reckoning - Dread Central
Connect with us

Writer/Director Andrew Barker Talks A Reckoning



Post Thumb:


Writer/director Andrew Barker is a man with a mission. For his first feature film, the stunning and gut-wrenching A Reckoning (review here), his mission is to get the film out to the fans who so desperately want to see this movie and for good reason – it’s excellent!

From the seeds of an encounter with an abandoned RAF base in Nottingham, England, Barker came up with the story of a lone man (Leslie Simpson) and the questions people will be discussing and debating long after the film is over: Is this a post-apocalyptic film? Has The Man removed himself from society and now prefers to live like a hermit? Or is The Man simply insane?

Writer/Director Andrew Barker Talks A Reckoning

Dread Central recently interviewed this amazing director to try and get some more insight into his polarizing film which very few have seen…yet.

DC: Hello, Andrew, and thank you for taking time to speak to Dread Central about your amazing new film (with the troubled history), A Reckoning. First, would you mind telling our readers a bit about yourself – where are you from? Where did you attend school? Did you always want to work in film? How did you get started in your film career? Just any nugget of information that comes to mind.

AB: I was born and raised in Derby, smack in the middle of England. It’s an industrial town, and when I left school, if you weren’t going to work in a factory or on a building site – of which I’ve done both throughout the years – then there really weren’t many other prospects.

However, school was a great time for me, although I did very little in the way of actual school work. I was into films from an early age, and me and a group of friends would get together on Saturday afternoons and make films on my mate’s home video camera. We’d usually remake the films of the day, so we’d do stuff like… say Die Hard in my mate’s back garden – that might give you an idea of how good these films were!

Films have always been a major part of my life. Jaws seems to be the film that I first remember having a profound effect on me. I was born in 1975, the year Jaws was released, so I’m very much a child of the imagery of Spielberg and Lucas; a child of the 80s. Just the other day I was talking to a friend about our nostalgia for the dawn of video, and what it was first like going into a video shop. It was a great time to be a film fan, and I was just at the right age for that revolution in home entertainment to have a huge effect on me.

DC: I know you’ve been asked this a million times but, aside from being inspired when you discovered the abandoned RAF base (where IS that place located?), when did the idea for A Reckoning first come to mind? And was there another inspiration for it? Is it a post-apocalyptic film, a film about a man who has withdrawn from society, a film about madness or something else completely?

AB: Post-apocalyptic imagery has always attracted me. I saw Mad Max 2 when I was very young and it just stuck – I love that movie. I can’t really pinpoint the exact moment A Reckoning came to me, other than from the first moment I found the location… fragments of the idea that became the final story were already forming in my head.

The RAF Base was just outside of Nottingham. I think they’ve built a new road through it now, at least that’s what they were planning to do when I last went up there about a year or so ago. We went back to shoot some footage for the on-going documentary… which will be an epic! If nothing else, the making of this film is fascinating; it’ll be like a what-not-to-do in filmmaking, at least in the politics of filmmaking! – thinking of calling it The Making, and then Unmaking of A Reckoning.

Anyway, I’m going off on a tangent… inspiration came from many different artists, from Cormac McCarthy to Richard Matheson to Herk Harvey to George Romero to Daniel Defoe. The place itself influenced me immensely as well.

As for the film itself, I guess it’s about the human condition, exposed to its rawest and most basic form. How long could a modern human being survive in a world where everything we now take for granted was taken away, all our technology, all our culture, and all connection to other humans. How long would a modern man survive before his mind cracked under the weight of loneliness?

DC: How would you sum up the film for those (and there are too many of “those”) who have not seen it yet?

AB: A Reckoning is the story of a lone man trapped and imprisoned in a barren, desolate landscape. His only companions are a village of straw people, these he converses with as neighbours and friends; he even teaches straw children at the local school. Yet, this anchor, this way of habitual living steadily becomes unravelled in frightening and disturbing ways.

DC: How would you describe The Man? And The Woman in White (Axelle Carolyn)? She is a complete enigma – does she represent an angel, happiness, salvation, death?

AB: The Man I guess is all of us… that is to say he represents humanity stripped away, exposed in the cold light of sorrow and loneliness. As for the Woman in White, well, I used to think she was real, but now I’m not so sure. That may sound strange, me not knowing, but as this story developed and was shaped between myself, Adam and Les, its depth and its shadows grew.

DC: How did you manage to shoot a feature-length movie (what IS the running time anyway?) in two weeks in the middle of England’s worst winter in decades? And on a micro budget?

AB: How did we manage to shoot it? Well, I often ask myself the same thing! First off we had a brilliant Assistant Director named Tiernan Hanby who held everything together and kept things moving. Also, Les is a one-take master; he’s remarkable.

But also, I think it’s because Adam and I can work extremely fast – some days we were doing 60 set-ups. We instinctively know what the other is thinking when approaching a scene, plus we both share the same philosophy on filmmaking – there are a lot of people who run around making films, acting like it is some kind of secret art, like they have some advanced knowledge. It’s bullshit. Filmmaking is hard work, there’s no glamour, no mystical art – if you’ve got your story tight, if you’ve cast well, and you know where to point the camera, you just shoot tirelessly. That’s it. Oh, and the running time is about 1 hour 40 minutes, give or take.

This balls-to-the-wall philosophy is what got us through the shoot, to the point where, even without warmth, electricity, and often working in blizzards, we still managed to get ahead of schedule to the point where we even came up with new scenes to shoot.

Writer/Director Andrew Barker Talks A Reckoning

DC: What process did you go through to cast your film, particularly the leads, Leslie Simpson and Axelle Carolyn, as well as gather your crew?

AB: I’d met Les the year previously when I interviewed him at some convention about Doomsday. I think it was Les who suggested Axelle, and I’m so glad he did, because I think she’s great.

As for the crew, I pretty much brought them all in, apart from Tiernan, who was also a suggestion by Les. Hannah Eccleston, my amazing make-up artist, is someone I’d known from years back when I was making short films. Before she worked on A Reckoning she’d spent a year in Mexico working on Mel Gibson’s Apocalypto and has since gone on to work on the final Harry Potter flick and the new X-Men movie; she’s amazing. I once asked her why she still wanted to come and play at filmmaking with us when she’d worked for Mel Gibson… I can’t remember what she said now…

A few people on the crew were wonderful folk I’d met out in Cannes. It was a great crew, even through the harsh conditions everybody gave 100%, and remained in great humour. Even though the film is quite a heavy and serious piece, I don’t think I’ve ever laughed so much in such a short space of time. It was a great shoot.

DC: Where did you find Director of Photography, Adam Krajczynski? The cinematography was simply brilliant!

AB: I met Adam a years before when we were both working for a shitty little local channel – we clicked immediately. In fact, I think I pitched him a film idea on the first day of meeting him.

Adam is an extraordinary artist – I believe he can do anything. His aesthetic intelligence is second to none. He has a clear vision, and like me, doesn’t like any fucking around. The term we had on set was, ‘Let’s just shoot the shit out of it.’

He’s a great editor as well. We spent a year shaping this film. We worked in his flat and spent day after day together and every day he’d surprise me with a unique and original way of approaching a scene. I’d love to see him direct something.

DC: I am very curious as to why the film’s title changed. I thought Straw Man had a sinister Wicker Man feel to it plus I think it fits the overall plot of the film perfectly. Care to share what happened?

AB: The reason is very simple – the name Straw Man was destroyed for us. When relations broke down in post-production with a party that financed the shoot itself, that name just gave both me and Adam a very bad feeling.

We decided to change it simply so we wouldn’t go crazy. We’d spent a year editing, without money or a break, and by the end of that year, that party were saying that the film was shelved, even though we were still working on it. At that point, it felt like it didn’t matter if we changed the title because we figured it was over anyway.

The title was meant to give us a fresh start; clean the palette if you will.

For me, A Reckoning for a far stronger title and says more about the nature of the film. Plus, I believe it’s more mature and not as obvious. Films change their titles all the time.

DC: Also, there have been indications in reviews of A Reckoning as well as in interviews that there is some sort of continuing “trouble” behind the scenes which is delaying the film’s wide release. Can you elaborate on what is going on? And what fans can do to actually SEE the film?

AB: Well it’s a very complicated saga, and to be honest, I don’t even know myself anymore. Shortly after principal photography, and even during, the writing was on the wall. Once we got into post-production, relations broke down with those who had financed much of the actual shoot. Adam and I couldn’t, and still can’t quite believe what went on. In fact, pretty much the entire cast and crew can’t quite believe it.

If it wasn’t for so much in-kind support we had, we would never have finished this film.

Now I’ll admit, we made mistakes ourselves, errors in judgement; sometimes our ambition blinded us, but the level of threats and bullying we were subjected to was beyond anything I’ve ever experienced before in my life.

It is a long, long story, and one that will be told one day, but I don’t think now is the time.

After all this happened, and the film was finished, I just sunk into a depression. I have pretty much stayed at home for a year, and only now I am beginning to feel normal again, and enthusiastic for new projects.

My wish is that all these positive reviews and wonderful things that are being said about the film make them reconsider their position. This film deserves to be seen. For the mistakes I’ve made, I am sorry. I am still grateful to them for getting this project rolling and I just hope in the future reason will be seen.

But in the end, nobody cares about what we went through, folk might be interested, but in who did what and who said what, none of it really matters, the film is the only thing that matters. I think we’ve created something beautiful, and you’re lucky to do that once in your life, if ever. Life is too short for these things.

How people can see the film on a wide scale… I just don’t know yet.

DC: There have also been quite a few comparisons of A Reckoning to Moon starring Sam Rockwell. How do you respond to those comparisons?

AB: I saw Moon while we were nearing the end of editing and saw there were similarities right away. But if anything, it just reconfirmed that we were on the right track.

DC: There are so many literary references in the film (Poe, Dickens, the Bible etc.), both verbal and visual (“Lovecraft” on the schoolroom chalkboard). How much of that was from your script or did you give Leslie free rein to ad-lib?

AB: Most of the literary references were in the original treatment. Using Dickens’ character names for straw people was something I added into the screenplay.

DC: Tell me about the straw people – how many of them were there? Who designed and made them? Did you get to keep any of them and what kinds of jokes were played on people over the course of the shoot that involved the straw people?

AB: I can’t remember how many of them there were, and I didn’t keep any of them, don’t know if anyone else did. Adam got a few emails after the shoot from people who had been round the base we used, saying they had the fright of their lives when they turned a corner and there was a straw figure stood there. So I guess we just left them there!

The set dresser made them and he did an amazing job, hats off to him. His sets were equally as brilliant.

DC: Several interviews have mentioned that you and your DP are admirers of the films of Terrence Malick and Werner Herzog. Did any of their influences work their way into A Reckoning?

AB: The beauty, poetry and graceful nature of any Malick film had a huge influence on me. He was someone Adam and I spoke about early on. I wrote a 44 page shot list running up to production, working out every single shot. It took me two months to write. I didn’t storyboard, I wrote the shots. At the start of that shot list I wrote a piece about how the film should move and I even referenced Malick.

After that, Adam and I went through the shot list and then on the shoot, we just used it as a guide. We were pretty loose, but without that shot list to always fall back on, we would have wasted a lot of time.

As for Herzog, another original genius, his influence was more about his philosophy on filmmaking. He’s under no illusion about filmmaking, he knows there is no secret art; it’s work and it’s hard, but he’s of the mind that if you want to make a film, then just grab a camera, steal one if you have to, which is what he says, and just shoot. He’s a very inspiring man. Anyone interested in filmmaking should read Herzog on Herzog; it’s a bible… but one you can believe in!

DC: You put your lead, Leslie Simpson, through hell, both physically and emotionally. How did you get him prepped to play The Man?

AB: I went up to his flat over several weekends in the run up to shooting and we would just talk the story and character through over and over. His dedication to the role was extraordinary, and he was amazing to watch. Without him, this film would be nothing.

It is an almost impossible task to command the screen alone for what, 90% of the film, and always hold the audiences’ attention. He is mesmerizing to watch. And he does this with very little dialogue. It’s an incredible performance.

DC: Just to satiate my own curiosity but why is the film not listed on the Internet Movie Database (IMDb)? Is this part of “the troubles”?

AB: We were on IMDb, but when the other party said they were shelving the film, they must have taken the page down.

DC: In order to get the word out about this truly thought-provoking film, people need to check out the official A Reckoning website, where there are trailers, interviews and more to be found. How much traffic has the site received?

AB: That website didn’t start out as the official website. It was a fan site, but it so pissed the other party off that they shelved the film because of it. I was just happy someone was getting the word out there for us. Then, it just became the official site because there was nothing else out there.

As for how much traffic the site gets, I have no idea, I don’t deal with the site directly and I’ve never asked.

DC: And there is also a Facebook site which can be found under the film’s original title, Straw Man, that has plenty of info as well as a Twitter account. So, there is no excuse for people to NOT check out the images and read the interviews and reviews for the film. Are there any other resources on the Internet for A Reckoning?

AB: No, they are the only resources on the net at the moment.

Writer/Director Andrew Barker Talks A Reckoning

DC: What are you working on now or what is on the horizon for you?

AB: It’s been a slow crawl back to being interested in making anything again, but I’m slowly healing now. Like I said before, I spent a year at home, and in that time I just wrote – short stories, outlines, I even completed a children’s book. But I have only just started to think about films again.

Just this week I’ve begun working on a screenplay with a writer named David Flint, which is a horror film set in the desert. We have an up and coming company in the states interested in this project. They are called Film Regions International, Inc and they’re just readying to release their documentary, My Amityville Horror, which I’m looking forward to seeing.

I also have a backlog of scripts that I’ve written with my usual writing partner Matthew Waldram, one of which I really would love to make.

It’s been difficult to move on until I knew the fate of A Reckoning, but I’m slowly starting to think about what to do next.

DC: As this is a horror site (and there IS horror in A Reckoning), are you a fan of horror films? If so, what are some of your favorites?

AB: I think The Texas Chain Saw Massacre is the greatest horror film ever made… Hooper’s of course. It is a relentless nightmare; it’s beautifully shot and just works on so many levels. It’s an extraordinary film.

I also love the old Universal Monster flicks; they’re just beautiful to look at.

Plus, I love the work of John Carpenter, early Romero, all the usual suspects really. As for modern horror, I guess Let the Right One In is the best horror film I’ve seen so far this century. It’s a masterpiece. I haven’t seen the remake.

DC: What is your opinion on the state of film horror these days?

AB: I’ve kind of developed a love/hate attitude towards horror films of late. I don’t love them like I used to when I was younger… even though I’m writing one at the moment!

I think films need to become scary again, not just disturbing. I think this is happening, but slowly.

DC: How about horror literature? Any particular authors you are a fan of (besides Poe)?

AB: Again all the usual suspects – King, Barker, Peter Straub, Richard Laymon… also Richard Matheson – I Am Legend is one of my favorite novels, and was another big influence on A Reckoning.

DC: What is one thing no one knows about Andrew Barker that you think they should know?

AB: I’m not going to let our film disappear and die.

Got news? Click here to submit it!
Make it a day of reckoning in the comments section below.

Image Type 1:

Get this site 100% Ad Free Support Us on Patreon!
Continue Reading


Check Out the Opening 2 Minutes of Another WolfCop



It was just earlier today that we brought you guys The Dude Design’s the newest poster for writer-director Lowell Dean’s horror-comedy sequel Another WolfCop.

And now we have the movie’s opening 2 minutes!

The clip showcases the new flick’s villain trying to sell us on his “Chicken Milk Beer” before losing his cool and taking it out the commercial’s crew. We then cut to a ragtag group of criminals, dressed as homeless Santas trying to outrun the cops.

A fun two-minutes if you ask me!

You can check out Another WolfCop‘s opening scene below and then make sure to hit us up and let us know what you think in the comments below or on social media!

The film is written and directed by Lowell Dean, produced by Bernie Hernando, Deborah Marks, and Hugh Patterson, and distributed worldwide by Cineplex.

Another WolfCop co-stars Amy Matysio, Jonathan Cherry, and Serena Miller. The film also features special appearances from Canadian music icon Gowan and legendary filmmaker Kevin Smith. It was executive produced by Sean Buckley, J. Joly, Bill Marks, Brian Wideen, Michael Kennedy, and Michael Hirsch.

The film is slated for a wide Cineplex theatrical release on Friday, December 8, 2017, with the film seeing a Blu-ray/DVD/Digital home entertainment release through A71 and Black Fawn in 2018.


A month has passed since the eclipse transformed hard-drinking Officer Lou Garou into the crime-fighting hellion WolfCop. Although the Shape Shifters controlling the town have been extinguished, Woodhaven is far from returning to normal. Lou’s liquor-fueled antics and full moon outbursts are seriously testing his relationship with Officer Tina Walsh – the new Chief of Police. An old friend has mysteriously reappeared with a truly bizarre secret to share, and a homicidal new villain has emerged from the shadows looking to finish what the Shape Shifters started. To defeat this lethal adversary, it will take more than a lone wolf packing a pistol.

Prepare for the next chapter of WolfCop that will be more dirty and hairy than the original! Consider yourself warned.

Get this site 100% Ad Free Support Us on Patreon!
Continue Reading


AHS: Cult Review: Clowns, Cults, Politics, and Peters



Starring Evan Peters, Sarah Paulson, Billie Lourd, Cheyenne Jackson, Frances Conroy, Mare Winningham, and Allison Pill

Created by Ryan Murphy and Brad Falchuk


It’s here. We’ve reached the end. The newest season of “American Horror Story” has ended and now we are here to provide you guys with our season review of AHS: Cult.

Spoiler free.

To start things off let me say I’m not the world’s biggest fan of “American Horror Story”. It breaks down like this: I enjoyed the absolute hell out of the first season of the series (“Murder House”), couldn’t get through “Asylum” (I know, I know, I’ve tried), dug “Coven” for what it was, really enjoyed “Freak Show”, and again I couldn’t get into “Hotel” or “Roanoke”.

That’s the story of me and “American Horror Story”. Plain And simple. But what did I think of the new seventh season of the notorious horror anthology series? Let’s find out.

Back when the seventh season of AHS was first announced (then going by the title “AHS: Election”) I was immediately intrigued by the new season because I heard it would not include any supernatural elements. Like the fourth season, “Freak Show”.

Now I’m a fan of ghosts and weird creature-men with drills for d*cks, don’t get me wrong. But the series has thus far relied almost exclusively on horrors of the supernatural variety (other than “Freak Show”) so this major change of pace was again welcomed by this guy.

Instead of vampires, aliens, and witches this season relied on terrors of the mind. Psychological fears and anxieties. The horrors man does to man. Deep issues.

Oh, and clowns. Like a lot of clowns.

But just because this new season didn’t include anything supernatural, that doesn’t mean the 11-episode season wasn’t filled with twisted visuals and horrifically disturbing acts. No, sir. This season boasted some showstoppers including S&M, gimps, and a house of horrors that wouldn’t be out of place in a Rob Zombie flick. It was all good.

But let’s backtrack a bit here.

Allow me to rundown the season’s plot for those who may be unaware. “AHS: Cult” tells the tale of a world post-election night. The literal dawn of Trump’s America. In one corner we have Sarah Paulson’s soccer mom, trying to fight through life with a series of crippling phobias (including clowns, holes, blood, and being a good person).

And in the other corner, we have Evan Peter’s angry, white (blue-haired) male, looking to seize Trump’s new position of power to bring about the end of… Actually, I want this to be a spoiler-free season review, so I’m just going to say the dude’s got big plans.

Like Manson-size plans. Let’s leave it at that.

With these two characters established, the new season then proceeds to send them spiraling into a collision course of political sabotage, intrigue, and clown-based nope, nope, nope-ing that can only end with one – or both – of them dead as Dillinger.

Overall “AHS: Cult” belonged end-to-end to Mr. Evan Peters. The young actor has continued to show his striking range from season to season of Ryan Murphy’s horror show and this season was no different. Peters’ turn as not only Kai, the blue-haired leader of the titular cult, but as infamous leaders such as David Koresh, Jim Jones, and Charles Manson – to name a few – owed this season.

I can only hope he doesn’t pull a Jessica Lange and opt-out of more AHS next year.

Speaking of top performances, “AHS: Cult ” showcases some other chilling and memorable turns with Alison Pill’s strangely vulnerable, put-upon wife character being the best next to Peters in my eyes. This actress needs to be in more films/TV!

Along with Pill, actress Billie Lourd killed it time and time again. The “Scream Queens” breakout star and Carrie Fisher spawn was yet again a highlight in her second Ryan Murphy series. Bet she has the starring role in next season. Mark my words.

Add to that, the season also boasts a handful of fun cameos, including John Carroll Lynch’s return as Twisty the Clown, Emma Roberts as a bitchy reporter that will do anything to end up on top, and Lena Dunham as SCUM Manifesto writer Valerie Solanas. The cameo cast killed it and I wish they would have been present for more episodes. What are you gonna do?

On the sour side of the season, I didn’t dig Sarah Paulson’s character. At all. But I’m sure that was the point. Right? I’m still not sure. But, boy, I wouldn’t even want to be stuck in line behind her at a Starbucks for three minutes, let alone spend the better part of this season’s 11-hours with her and her whiny bullshite. Urgh.

That said, she pulled it out by the finale. That’s all I’ll say.

In the end, I enjoyed this season as much as – if not more – than any other of the series. “Murder House” will still no doubt go on as my favorite season of the series, but “AHS: Cult” will rank third after season one and “Freak Show”.

While I was on the fence about the season after three episodes, the show ended up ditching Paulson’s character (and/or shifting her arch) after a lull so the episodes picked up quickly. Whenever the season turned its focus back towards Peters (in whichever incarnation he was playing at the time) the show got better and better. Every time.

Not a bad way to spend my Tuesday night for the past 11 weeks.

Bring on season 12.

  • American Horror Story: Cult (2018)


The seventh season of Ryan Murphy’s American Horror Story was Evan Peters’ show all the way through. The young actor pulled out all the stops time and time again to make what may have been a lackluster supernatural-free season a winner.

User Rating 4 (3 votes)
Get this site 100% Ad Free Support Us on Patreon!
Continue Reading


The Axiom Review – A Stylish and Clever Slice of Independent Horror




Starring Hattie Smith, Zac Titus, Nicole Dambro

Directed by Nicholas Woods

The Axiom is an ambitious, well directed, impressively acted and stunningly shot independent horror film that has just a few, teensy little flaws holding it back from greatness (and therefore will have to settle for just being really, really good, instead).

The first thing you realize when watching The Axiom is that this is a beautiful film. Everything is framed and shot in a lush and stylish manner, but one which is always tonally appropriate for the scene.

The second thing you’ll notice, and keep noticing as the film plays out, is that the movie really struck gold with this cast. Not only is there a total lack of the sort of stilted and unnatural acting seen in countless other microbudget horror affairs, but the performances are genuinely fantastic across the board. The main characters are believably chill and relatably normal in the early scenes, and the acting remains just as impressive once things start getting a bit more… intense. It’s not often that an independent horror film has so many good performances that it makes it hard to pick the movie’s acting VIP, but that is undeniably the case here. Taylor Flowers delivers what is probably the showiest performance (and does it very well, indeed), but the entire cast really is quite good.

The central premise of the film is both interesting and original, and touches upon the real life fact (given some recent attention in the ‘Missing 411’ books and documentary) that a lot more people sure seem to go missing out in the woods than seems reasonable, while simultaneously weaving all sorts of folklore, fairy tales and urban legends into the mix. It’s also clever in the way that it very naturally reveals aspects to the relationships between characters that serve to later – or sometimes retroactively – explain some of the more questionable decisions they make or attitudes they display. While that may sound like screenwriting 101, it’s surprising how many films fail to do this. The Axiom rewards the viewer’s attention in other ways as well, with many aspects of the movie that initially feel odd or unnatural receiving reasonable explanations (within the context of the movie) by the end. It’s not quite as challenging (or as rewarding) in this regard as, say, something like Session 9, but it does add a nice layer of complexity to the storytelling.

The film’s score, by Leo Kaliski, is also quite good. There may be a moment here or there where the music hits an overly familiar beat, but overall it not only fits the movie’s tone, but does quite a bit to help set that tone as well.

The only thing that I don’t feel the movie quite pulls off – and I’m trying to be vague here, because I feel like the less you know going into this film, the better – is some of the makeup effects work. The gore stuff is very well executed, but some of the other stuff feels like it was crafted with the intention of shooting it in a more… stylized manner. Instead, filmed as it is here, the result is sometimes less than impressive and can fail to make the impact that the movie seems to be implying that it should. And while some of what the makeup effects lack in execution is made up for with the ingenuity and creativity of their design, it’s still a bit of a shame when they don’t quite pull them off because, aside from a few niggles that I have with the writing, the effects are the only aspect of the film that occasionally fails to live up to the high level of technical proficiency that The Axiom otherwise demonstrates.


  • Man, the acting in this movie is really good. The dialogue may stumble once or twice, but these actors always sell it anyway.
  • Give back Mia Sara’s DNA, Hattie Smith!
  • If you’re going to put your female lead in shorts this small, I hope you’re not sensitive to viewers unleashing a nonstop parade of “Has anyone seen my pants / OH GOD WHERE ARE MY PANTS!” jokes.
  • “You just pop this here ‘Blair Witch Stick Person / Anarchy sign’ sticker up on that there windshield of yours, and them park rangers? Well – heh heh – they won’t bother you none, no sir.” Hmmmmm…
  • The film really is shot amazingly well – better than a lot of mainstream releases. Cinematographer Sten Olson has a real future ahead of him.
  • As does writer / director Nicholas Woods, for that matter. Any director who can get this level of quality out of their cast and crew on their first ever film is someone to keep an eye on.
  • “I’ll make a run for it and get help,” says the female lead, and I’m like “Yeah, let her go – she has no pants to weigh her down.”
  • The gore effects in the movie are both realized and utilized very well.
  • Welcome back to horror movies, “I’ll be right back” dialogue spoken unironically by and/or to ill-fated characters.
  • The Axiom


In the end, The Axiom is a solid and entertaining flick that manages to wring a level of quality and originality out of the somewhat tired “Don’t Go in the Woods” horror subgenre not seen since 2012’s Cabin in the Woods. The cinematography and acting are hugely impressive, it features a nice, unnerving score, the premise is original and captivating, and the whole thing moves at a nice pace that helps keep the film’s flaws from dragging it down.

User Rating 3.86 (7 votes)
Get this site 100% Ad Free Support Us on Patreon!
Continue Reading

Go Ad Free!

Support Dread Central on Patreon!

Join the Box of Dread Mailing List

* indicates required

From Around the Web