Canadian Scream 4 Trailer Home to Lots of New Footage

Our friends up north have just gotten themselves their very own trailer for Scream 4, and honestly? It blows ours away. We wouldn’t be too surprised to see a new U.S. one soon. Dig it!

Scream 4 stars Neve Campbell, Courteney Cox, David Arquette, Britt Robertson, Emma Roberts, Hayden Panettiere, Rory Culkin, Nico Tortorella, Mary McDonnell, Anthony Anderson, Aimee Teegarden, and Marielle Jaffe with confirmed cameos by Anna Paquin, Kristen Bell, Shenae Grimes, and Lucy Hale.

Look for Scream 4 in theatres on April 15th, 2011, and to stay on top of things, be sure to follow @wescraven on Twitter.

“Sidney Prescott (Neve Campbell), now the author of a self-help book, returns home to Woodsboro on the last stop of her book tour. There she reconnects with Sheriff Dewey (David Arquette) and Gale (Courteney Cox), who are now married, as well as her cousin Jill (Emma Roberts) and her Aunt Kate (Mary McDonnell). Unfortunately Sidney’s appearance also brings about the return of Ghostface, putting Sidney, Gale, and Dewey, along with Jill, her friends, and the whole town of Woodsboro in danger.”

Thanks to DC reader Joey M. for the tip off!

Trailer removed by request.

Scream 4 – Trailer
Uploaded by dreadcentral. – Watch feature films and entire TV shows.

Uncle Creepy

Got news? Click here to submit it!
Scream your lungs out until you fill up the comments section below!

Image Type 1:

Steve Barton

You're such an inspiration for the ways that I will never, ever choose to be.

  • Rottenjesus

    Hear that sound? That’s Wes Craven sitting on our collective faces and blowing an extremely wet and chunky fart.

  • Shambling_in_Bandages

    So the main purpose of ‘Scream 4′ is to make everyone re-evaluate ‘Scream 3’s reputation as the worst ‘Scream’ movie? ‘Cos that’s all I’m getting from that terrible, terrible trailer.

  • doubleh55

    I’m on the exact opposite side of the fence. Then again I’m from the generation that likes the original Scream.

  • LSD Zombie

    As crappy and laughable as that trailer was, I’m still going to see it. Nostalgia and guilty pleasures can be a real bitch.

  • Sirand

    I have to admit, the remake bit had me in stitches!

  • Terminal

    So while the original events did happen the movie that stemmed from the events are so famous the characters are mocking the crimes and are self-aware? This looks really terrible. There were some moments of bad writing, and the new horror rules are stupid. How many killers film their kills in horror movies these days beyond that stupid Chrome Skull? And does the virgin really have a risk of being killed too? Which movie does that happen?
    “We are bad guys. That means we’ve got more to do other than bullying companies. It’s fun to lead a bad man’s life.”

    • Rob

      Well in Cherry Falls the killer was only going after virgins. That movie’s a bit of a guilty pleasure for me.

      • Terminal

        I love “Cherry Falls.”
        “We are bad guys. That means we’ve got more to do other than bullying companies. It’s fun to lead a bad man’s life.”

  • Vanvance1

    Looks bad. Very bad. The kind of bad you get when you completely exhaust an idea, the broad media misinterprets what you’ve done and you follow it up accepting the new interpretation.

    To wit, Scream was a satire of horror movies, not a straight up horror. Alas, many failed to understand that and crap like ‘Scary Movie’ added emphasis to the misinformation.

    In the end we’re left with a concept that is not now (nor has it ever been) viable for a sequel.

    Further, we’re left with a director who no longer has the chops to innovate or even tell a generic story properly.

    This will be bad. Probably not epically bad, just predictable, dull, by the numbers bad.

    If I’m wrong I’ll sing it’s praises but I have a feeling this is another ‘Nightmare on Elm Street’ remake situation where we’re bludgeoned with endless articles that are part of the hype machine.