Will Child's Play Work As a TV Series? - Dread Central
Connect with us


Will Child’s Play Work As a TV Series?



** Contains Cult of Chucky Spoilers **

Recently we were all hit by the killer news that Don Mancini and long-time Child’s Play producer David Kirschner will be developing a TV series based on the Child’s Play franchise. Chucky on the small screen? I’m there.

But as enthusiastic as all of us here at Dread Central are, we are still seeing comments here and there that Child’s Play isn’t suited for the small screen and will be a bust before it airs a single episode. Bull. And shit.

The Child’s Play series has evolved like a xenomorph these past few entries and a TV series is the best – if only – place the franchise could go from here.

With all of that in mind, let’s take a look at why we think Child’s Play: The Series is going to be the best thing to hit horror since Tom McLoughlin brought Jason back from the dead in Friday the 13th Part VI: Jason Lives.

One of the major reasons that Child’s Play is going to make a great TV series is how much writer-director Don Mancini stepped up the game in the latest entry Cult Of Chucky.

Not only do we now have multiple Chucky dolls running around, the rule has now been established that possessed dolls can move into other possessed dolls. So not only does this mean that Chucky can basically do as he damn well pleases, Tiffany, and the Seed of Chucky himself/herself Glenn/Glenda can do so as well. Pretty cool, huh?

The possibilities for just this new bit of info is enough to crowd the hell out of the next entry. Hell, it’s enough to overstuff the next 3 entries (if not more). A TV series will allow Mancini and company to dive into the possibilities presented with this new development with as much time as they need to make it sing.

And speaking of overstuffed, a TV series is the best place for the Child’s Play series to go next for another major reason: Don Mancini is circling the wagons. What I mean by that is Mancini has been – with the last two films – bringing more and more of his classic characters back into the fold that we haven’t seen since the original films.

Thus far we have seen the return of Alex Vincent’s Andy and in the post-credits scene of Cult of Chucky now we have Christine Elise’s Kyle from Child’s Play 2 back in action for some Chucky vengeance. A TV series will allow Mancini to really bring all of his classic characters back into the story in organic ways, and not just for cameos.

Imagine the return of Chris Sarandon’s Mike Norris and Catherine Hicks’ Karen Barclay (aka Andy’s mom) from the original film. That’d be awesome, right? Especially if they were still together and now formed a “Kick Chucky’s Ass” club with other parents whose children befell the wrath of Chucky and his family of killers.

How about the return of Perrey Reeves as De Silva from Child’s Play 3? We already saw in Cult of Chucky that Andy keeps his Kent Military Academy sweatshirt in a glass box, thus proving he still honors those days. Maybe De Silva can come back as a possible love interest for Andy. Lost love. Sigh. Sounds good to me!

Side Note: Jeremy Sylvers’ Tyler from Child’s Play 3 can just stay out of all of this, thank you very much.

Other characters who could see their return in “Child’s Play: The Series” are Bride of Chucky‘s Jade and Jesse played by Katherine Heigl and Nick Stabile. Would Heigl return? Doubtful, but you never know! Especially if it was for a bit part. We’ll see…

Hell, even Summer Howell could return as Alice from Curse of Chucky. I know it was heavily implied she was dead in Cult of Chucky but they never came out and said it and I didn’t see a body. Did you? Nope. She’s still alive, I promise.

So there we have returning cast members and characters from the Child’s Play series, and multiple killer dolls as our main reasons for the series to make a slick transition to the small screen. But how about the bigger issues? Like the scale of the story being told here.

Fiona Dourif is now possessed by Chucky, so this kicks things into a whole new gear. How is Chucky’s relationship going to go with Tiffany now that they are both females? What will Glenn/Glenda think of his daddy’s gender-swapping? The mind reels with possibilities; not only could the series be a blast, but Mancini could tackle some important current topics as well.

And not just that, but the series could finally give the story enough time to unfold more backstory of Charles Lee Ray (and Tiffany) before that fateful night at the toy store. Sure people always say that too much backstory takes away the fear of a character, but really, since when has Chucky been scary?

I think it’s time to delve into the history of these characters, specifically Brad Dourif as Charles Lee Ray. Plus – BOOM – didn’t even think about this until right this moment, but duh, this would give us the opportunity to see Papa Dourif “in-person” so to speak as he could/should play young Charles Lee Ray as well – and much more than the tidbits we got in Curse of Chucky.

In closing, personally, I feel that “Child’s Play: The Series” is going to work like gangbusters. Not only is Don Mancini well-versed in horror TV, with “Hannibal” and “Channel Zero” under his belt, but this series will afford new writers/directors the opportunity to bring their fresh perspectives to the world of Chucky.

I think it is officially time to get excited, ladies and gents!


And that is why we think that Don Mancini’s Child’s Play will make an awesome TV series. What do you think? Let us know below!




Exclusive: Talking Movie Theater Subscription Plans With Sinemia Founder Rifat Oguz



Have you heard of a monthly theatrical subscription service called MoviePass? More than likely by this point you have.

But what about Sinemia?

Via their official site, Sinemia is “a private movie club that provides discounted movie ticket subscription plans. Through a combination of easy to use technology and pre-paid debit cards, Sinemia has created an innovative solution for the movie-going experience.”

After announcing its U.S. launch, the high-end movie ticket subscription service was welcomed to the country with a lawsuit from competitor MoviePass.

Recently we had the opportunity to sit down and chat with Sinemia’s founder Rifat Oguz, and we talked about the services, the lawsuit, and our favorite movies in general.

Give the interview a look-see below and then let us know what you think!

Dread Central: First off, can you tell us a bit about how Sinemia works and what you offer?

Rifat Oguz: Sinemia offers different plans according to your movie watching frequency. The most popular one is 2 times in a month for $8.99. It’s free 2D or 3D tickets in any theater, for any movie, and includes features like reserved seating, the IMAX-4DX-XD-ScreenX-DBox experience, private screenings and more for one low monthly fee; support for advance ticket purchases and support for third-party ticket processors like Fandango.

DC: Where did the idea for Sinemia begin?

RO: I’ve always been passionate about movies. When I realized there were so many empty seats in movie theaters throughout the world, I decided to change that by developing an idea for a “movie ticket subscription” system.

DC: Sinemia is already leading the market in the United Kingdom, Canada, Turkey, and Australia. Can you talk a bit more about this?

RO: We don’t have any competitors, globally. Our only competitor is in the US. We are trying to create a global system for all the moviegoers on the planet.

DC: Why the move to the U.S.?

RO: Because the heart of the movie market is in the U.S.

DC: How does Sinemia differ from other services such as MoviePass?

RO: Firstly, we don’t track our subscribers or sell their personal data because we don’t need to earn money from data. We have a sustainable financial model. Our subscribers are our clients, not our product. As previously stated, Sinemia offers different plans according to your movie watching frequency.

DC: Speaking of MoviePass, the “rival” company recently filed a lawsuit Sinemia for “using its patented electronic payment technology without authorization.” Care to comment?

RO: MoviePass tries to block us because our sustainable and less restrictive model promises much more to customers and the overall movie market. The reason for their effort is to block serious, true competition.

DC: Where do you see Sinemia in 5 years?

RO: We believe that we’ll be giving service in all 5 continents to millions of movie lovers.

DC: I always end with this question: What’s your favorite scary movie?

RO: The Shining is a classic. But if you’re asking for a more recent movie, I think The Conjuring is my favorite.


Thanks for chatting with us today, Rifat!

For more info on Sinemia, visit the official site RIGHT HERE.


Continue Reading

Brennan Went To Film School

Brennan Went to Film School: These Aren’t Your Daddy’s Strangers



“Brennan Went to Film School” is a column that proves that horror has just as much to say about the world as your average Oscar nominee. Probably more, if we’re being honest.


If you’re a die hard horror fan, you were probably pleasantly surprised when you sat down to watch The Strangers: Prey at Night, the decade-later sequel to Bryan Bertino’s potent little 2008 shocker, and discovered that it was a full-barreled homage to John Carpenter and synth-drizzled 80’s cinema. But once you scratch past the surface, it makes perfect sense why digs up the horror tropes of yesteryear.

You see, the movie is inherently about the war between two generations that has been playing out in the media over the past couple years. You’re probably familiar with the cavalcade of articles about millennials killing everything from the napkin industry to the lottery to Applebee’s. It always happens this way: older generations are frightened by the shifting tastes and perspectives of new generations, and the way a world shaped by them is going to look. It happened with the introduction of video games, rock ‘n roll, and even novels way back in the day.

Now the Internet age has made things especially frightening and unrecognizable. Kids and teens now have access to the broadest spectrum of information in human history, and their attempts to carve out their own identities alongside this rapid increase in social and political awareness have received a lot of pushback from the parents and authority figures in their lives.

The Strangers: Prey at Night is essentially about transposing that generational battle onto a grand, bloody canvas. On the micro scale, there’s the literal reason our family foursome is facing the evil trio of murders: their young daughter Kinsey has “behavioral issues” that frighten her parents, who just don’t understand, so they are sending her off to a boarding school. The trailer park where they’re staying on the way to drop her off becomes the site of their own gruesome demise. “Out of sight, out of mind” is the idea, but what they end up with is “out of time,” as the Strangers rip and slash their way through their faux domestic tranquility.

Which brings us to the macro side of things: The Strangers, along with being a literal dredging up of the past (these particular villains haven’t been onscreen for ten years – time sure flies, doesn’t it?), bring a whole horde of classic horror tropes and stylistic elements with them, from Adrian Johnston’s glorious synthwave score to the neon-splashed coloring to the Texas Chainsaw infused finale. In fact, the lead Baghead villain finds it impossible to kill without an 80’s track blaring on his truck’s stereo. He’s basically Baby Driver’s evil twin. All these elements of older horror films are the exact things being used to torture and terrify the teens in this trailer park.

In two entirely different contexts, the older generation is seeking to hold these kids back and prevent them from being independent, especially Kinsey, who finds herself a particular target for their torment.

But just as past generations always eventually surrender and give way to the new, the siblings in Prey at Night triumph over their attackers. The senseless, random violence that claimed the lives of the victims in the original Strangers is no match for this duo of smarter, more capable protagonists. They are able to unmask, unsettle, and eventually destroy the Strangers without the help of any adult.

It’s no coincidence that Kinsey uses the very symbol of her teen rebellion (a cigarette lighter she uses as a performative way to show just how punk she is) to escape certain death, by igniting a puddle of gasoline under the lead Stranger. The knife-wielding antagonists eventually go the way of Applebee’s thanks to two kids who strove to be more than their now-dead parents and succeeded, though certainly not in a manner any of them could have ever predicted.

Also, if you think about it, The Strangers: Prey at Night is in and of itself a child. It was born from the original film, but it feels completely different from its predecessor. It sees the plot and tone of that film and strikes off in its own new direction. Thus, the generational war plays out on the biggest scale possible for this universe: the very existence of the movie itself.

This constant battle between old and new has an inevitable conclusion, and the people who made The Strangers know it. This is a film for a new generation about a new generation, and the infinitely more connected kids we’re seeing these days are capable of a previously unimaginable strength and solidarity. That’s reflected in the less downbeat ending here, which shows that the new generation has a chance in battling the senseless violence and grim patterns of their parents.

With more understanding and self-actualization, they’re going to create a brand new world that would be unrecognizable to previous generations, though hopefully one that hasn’t forgotten just how awesome Carpenterian synthwave music is.

Brennan Klein is a writer and podcaster who talks horror movies every chance he gets. And when you’re talking to him about something else, he’s probably thinking about horror movies. On his blog, Popcorn Culture, he is running through reviews of every slasher film of the 1980’s, and on his podcast, Scream 101, he and a non-horror nerd co-host tackle horror reviews with a new sub-genre every month!


Continue Reading


The Conjuring 2’s Elvis Scene Should Be Seen By Every Aspiring Filmmaker



What makes a horror movie actually scary? Is it the villains who threaten the lives of the protagonists? Is it the knowledge that anyone could meet his/her demise at any second? Is it the gore and viscera that sprays across the screen? Or is it something else, something deeper?

For me, horror only affects me deeply when I can empathize with what I’m seeing. As an example, it’s the reason that Dr. Gordon’s racking sobs towards the end of Saw caused tears to spring in my own eyes. The fact that we know that his family is safe only amplifies the anguish of the climax. I was begging for him to find some way of finding out what had happened so that he could find some semblance of peace. When he finally grabs the saw, my horror is met in equal measure with a terrifying understanding. This man thinks his family is being killed, so how can I fault him for doing what he’s doing? I can’t blame him or mock his decision, like I can in so many other horror situations. His love for his family, the guilt that encompasses him, it all spills over in a flood of fear, terror, and desperation. To this day, I still find the 3rd act of Saw emotionally difficult to sit through.

So what does this have to do with The Conjuring 2? Well, everything! What director James Wan has done with both films is he’s created a world where we spend time with the characters in ways that build up who they are rather than the situation they’re in. By taking the time to make me care about the characters, I care about what actually happens to them. And no scene in The Conjuring 2 enforces that point more than when Ed spots a guitar and plays Elvis Presley’s “Can’t Help Falling in Love.”

Here’s the scene I’m talking about:

I’m the kind of person who gets really uncomfortable with “cringe” videos and stories. If a comedy bases its humor on making fun of people rather than situations, I usually will hate it with every fiber of my being. I will pull my hood over my head and cover my eyes while putting my hands on my ears. I’ll do whatever I can to avoid the awkward uncomfortableness of the scene because it makes me feel like my entire body is crawling.

When Ed asks for the guitar, I originally thought, “Oh no, please don’t do this.” I was ready to curl up in the middle of the theater and suffer for the next few minutes. But what happened during that scene was quite possibly the most important part of the entire movie. After seeing the Hodgsons suffer without help and recognizing that each of them was basically at a breaking point, this interlude was a momentary, yet precious reprieve from seemingly unending fear. As an audience member, seeing those children smile and sing along with Ed Warren was, and still is, perhaps the best example of “heartwarming” I can think of.

But what’s more is what else is happening while Ed plays. It’s the sidelong glance he gives Lorraine that is full of love, a look reciprocated by her as we, the audience, see the love that these two have for each other only grow stronger. Because the film takes those few seconds to establish such a strong relationship, the later events are all the more dramatic. When Ed goes into the basement and the door locks behind him, the separation between him and Lorraine is heart-wrenching. Watching her pound on the door while crying his name between tears feels real because the story made it so.

It’s also seeing Peggy Hodgson as she sits behind her children, a huge smile on her face while she watches them sing along with Ed, brushing tears of happiness from her eyes occasionally. For all the struggles and horrors that they’ve endured, her love for her children has never waned and her want for them to have a wonderful, safe life is clearly apparent.

By building such strong relationships between the characters and, in turn, between the characters and the audience, any danger that they encounter feels all the more dramatic and threatening. Were I to not care about these characters, as I don’t in pretty much any Friday the 13th film or Amityville sequel*, then I would never be scared by the film. It’s because of my attachment to those on the screen that I feel terror.

To every aspiring filmmaker, I offer you my one piece of advice that I feel is the most important lesson of all: If you can make me care about your characters, you’ll make me care about your film.

*Not trying to bash these films. Just saying that they are definitely lacking when it comes to character development.


Continue Reading

Go Ad Free!

Support Dread Central on Patreon!

Recent Comments


Join the Box of Dread Mailing List

* indicates required


Copyright © 2017 Dread Central Media LLC